Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540077›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Partner intrinsic characteristics influence foraging trip duration, but not coordination of care in wandering albatrosses

Fionnuala R McCully, Henri Weimerskirch, Stephen J Cornell, Ben J Hatchwell, Milena Cairo, Samantha C Patrick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fionnuala R McCullySchool of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-388X
Henri WeimerskirchCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Villiers en Bois France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-586X
Stephen J CornellInstitute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6026-5236
Ben J HatchwellSchool of Biosciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-4782
Milena CairoCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (UMR 7204) Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-1514
Samantha C PatrickSchool of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-944X
University of Liverpool · GBCentre d'Écologie et des Sciences de la Conservation · FRCentre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé · FRUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-lived monogamous species gain long-term fitness benefits by equalizing effort during biparental care. For example, many seabird species coordinate care by matching foraging trip durations within pairs. Age affects coordination in some seabird species; however, the impact of other intrinsic traits, including personality, on potential intraspecific variation in coordination strength is less well understood. The impacts of pair members' intrinsic traits on trip duration and coordination strength were investigated using data from saltwater immersion loggers deployed on 71 pairs of wandering albatrosses

Indexed as

albatrossesbehavioral coordinationforaging boutnest attendanceparental carepersonalityseabirds

Identifiers

PMID36540077
PMCPMC9754911
OpenAlexW4311591365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.