Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36540054›Full record

ArticlePersonality and individual differences2021

Do coping responses predict better/poorer mental health in Portuguese adults during Portugal's national lockdown associated with the COVID-19?

Margarida Jarego, Filipa Pimenta, José Pais-Ribeiro, Rui M Costa, Ivone Patrão, Lina Coelho, Alexandra Ferreira-Valente

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and individual differences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Managing the unexpected: Bicultural identity integration during the COVID-19 emergency.International journal of intercultural relations : IJIR · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Margarida JaregoWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal.
Filipa PimentaWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal.
José Pais-RibeiroWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal.
Rui M CostaWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal.
Ivone PatrãoApplied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal.
Lina CoelhoCenter for Social Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra 3000-104, Portugal.
Alexandra Ferreira-ValenteWilliam James Center for Research, ISPA - University Institute, Lisbon 1149-041, Portugal.
ISPA - Instituto Universitário · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Coimbra · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed at assessing the mental health status of adults living in Portugal during the national lockdown of March 2020 to May 2020, how study participants coped with stress during the national lockdown, as well as the association between coping responses and mental health status. Methods: 430 adults from the general population living in Portugal completed measures of mental health status and coping. Results: Participants reported a mental health status in the normal range. Most commonly used coping responses were acceptance, planning and active coping. The use of instrumental and emotional support, self-blame, venting, denial, behavioural disengagement, and substance use were associated with poorer mental health. Active coping, positive reframing, acceptance, and humour were associated with better mental health. However, only positive reframing and humour significantly predicted better mental health, while only substance use predicted poorer mental health. Conclusions: Findings suggest that there was not a significant negative impact of the Portuguese national lockdown in the adults living in Portugal. Findings supported positive reframing and humour as being adaptive coping responses in this context. These responses should be encouraged by healthcare professionals and targeted in the context of psychosocial intervention programs directed to most vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Coping responsesCOVID-19Cross-sectional studyMental healthNational lockdown

Identifiers

PMID36540054
PMCPMC9755831
OpenAlexW3126676480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.