Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2022
Quality of care in patients undergoing coronary angiography with a known risk of contrast-associated acute kidney injury: a retrospective observational study.
Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIodinated contrast medium is potentially nephrotoxic in susceptible individuals. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to determine the impact of hospital-wide implementation of a guideline to prevent contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) on quality of care and outcomes.
methodsA hospital-wide guideline for management of patients known to be at risk of CA-AKI was implemented in April 2019. All patients who underwent coronary angiography at our institution between November 2018 and March 2019 (period 1, before introduction of the guideline) and between August and December 2019 (period 2, after introduction of the guideline) were enrolled.
resultsIn total, 561 patients were enrolled for period 1 and 578 for period 2. CA-AKI was impossible to diagnose in many patients because of missing post-procedure creatinine control data. Preventive measures were initiated more often in period 2 than in period 1 and in older patients than in younger patients. Preventive measures were not initiated in at least 50% of patients at risk of CA-AKI despite implementation of the guideline.
conclusionsManagement of patients at known risk of CA-AKI remains inadequate at our institution even after introduction of a guideline. Physicians should receive organized training in acute kidney injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.