Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539895›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2022

Development and validation of an AI-enabled digital breast cancer assay to predict early-stage breast cancer recurrence within 6 years.

Gerardo Fernandez, Marcel Prastawa, Abishek Sainath Madduri, Richard Scott, Bahram Marami, Nina Shpalensky, Krystal Cascetta, Mary Sawyer, Monica Chan, Giovanni Koll and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06309615 (Prospective Clinical Utility / Decision Support Study of an AI-enabled Digital Breast Cancer Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06309615 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Clinical Utility / Decision Support Study of an AI-enabled Digital Breast Cancer Test (Precise Dx Breast, PDxBRTM) to Predict Early-stage Breast Cancer Recurrence Within 6 Years

TypeobservationalSponsorPrecise Dx, Inc.Ran2025 to 2029Enrolled300ConditionsBreast CancerArmsStandard of Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Breast Cancer Care Delivery and Education: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gerardo FernandezPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Marcel PrastawaPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Abishek Sainath MadduriPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Richard ScottPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Bahram MaramiPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Nina ShpalenskyPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Krystal CascettaMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Mary SawyerIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Monica ChanIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Giovanni KollPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Alexander ShtabskyPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Aaron FelizPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Thomas HansenMount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Brandon VeremisIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Carlos Cordon-CardoIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jack ZeinehPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA.
Michael J DonovanPreciseDx, 1111 Amsterdam, Stuyvesant Building 8-822, New York, NY, 10025, USA. mdonovan@precisedx.ai.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

Scientific ReagentsP01CA087497 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI PETRINI, JOHN HJ · 2000 to 2021
$35.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA087497
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) grading plays a critical role in patient management despite the considerable inter- and intra-observer variability, highlighting the need for decision support tools to improve reproducibility and prognostic accuracy for use in clinical practice. The objective was to evaluate the ability of a digital artificial intelligence (AI) assay (PDxBr) to enrich BC grading and improve risk categorization for predicting recurrence.

methodsIn our population-based longitudinal clinical development and validation study, we enrolled 2075 patients from Mount Sinai Hospital with infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. With 3:1 balanced training and validation cohorts, patients were retrospectively followed for a median of 6 years. The main outcome was to validate an automated BC phenotyping system combined with clinical features to produce a binomial risk score predicting BC recurrence at diagnosis.

resultsThe PDxBr training model (n = 1559 patients) had a C-index of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76-0.81) versus clinical 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74) and image feature models 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.74). A risk score of 58 (scale 0-100) stratified patients as low or high risk, hazard ratio (HR) 5.5 (95% CI 4.19-7.2, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.77, NPV 0.95, and PPV 0.32 for predicting BC recurrence within 6 years. In the validation cohort (n = 516), the C-index was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79) versus clinical 0.71 (95% CI 0.66-0.75) versus image feature models 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63-071). The validation cohort had an HR of 4.4 (95% CI 2.7-7.1, p < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.60, specificity 0.77, NPV 0.94, and PPV 0.24 for predicting BC recurrence within 6 years. PDxBr also improved Oncotype Recurrence Score (RS) performance: RS 31 cutoff, C-index of 0.36 (95% CI 0.26-0.45), sensitivity 37%, specificity 48%, HR 0.48, p = 0.04 versus Oncotype RS plus AI-grade C-index 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.79), sensitivity 78%, specificity 49%, HR 4.6, p < 0.001 versus Oncotype RS plus PDxBr, C-index 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82), sensitivity 67%, specificity 80%, HR 6.1, p < 0.001.

conclusionsPDxBr is a digital BC test combining automated AI-BC prognostic grade with clinical-pathologic features to predict the risk of early-stage BC recurrence. With future validation studies, we anticipate the PDxBr model will enrich current gene expression assays and enhance treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesArtificial intelligent image analysisBreast cancerPrognostic grade

Identifiers

PMID36539895
PMCPMC9764637
OpenAlexW4312114078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.