ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2022
Development and validation of an AI-enabled digital breast cancer assay to predict early-stage breast cancer recurrence within 6 years.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06309615 (Prospective Clinical Utility / Decision Support Study of an AI-enabled Digital Breast Cancer Test), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Clinical Utility / Decision Support Study of an AI-enabled Digital Breast Cancer Test (Precise Dx Breast, PDxBRTM) to Predict Early-stage Breast Cancer Recurrence Within 6 Years
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidance for laboratory implementation, governance and continuous assurance of artificial intelligence in histopathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Multi-modal AI for comprehensive breast cancer prognostication.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Breast Cancer Care Delivery and Education: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- How artificial intelligence applied to digital pathology could guide treatment personalization in breast cancer.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- Enhancing breast cancer detection with AI for early diagnosis and recurrence prediction.Oncoscience · 2026Review
- Deep learning for digital pathology: A critical overview of methodological framework.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Review
- TransBreastNet a CNN transformer hybrid deep learning framework for breast cancer subtype classification and temporal lesion progression analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- External validation of precisebreast, a digital prognostic test for predicting breast cancer recurrence, in an early-stage cohort from the Netherlands.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Towards precision therapy in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Article
- Computational pathology for breast cancer: Where do we stand for prognostic applications?Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Review
- Characterisation of HER2-Driven Morphometric Signature in Breast Cancer and Prediction of Risk of Recurrence.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in enhancing breast cancer screening and diagnosis: A review of current advances.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Review
- The yin and yang of chromosomal instability in prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2024Review
- Automated Prognosis Marker Assessment in Breast Cancers Using BLEACH&STAIN Multiplexed Immunohistochemistry.Biomedicines · 2023Article
- Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting the prognosis of patients with lymph node-positive invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: based on SEER database and external validation cohort.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BC) grading plays a critical role in patient management despite the considerable inter- and intra-observer variability, highlighting the need for decision support tools to improve reproducibility and prognostic accuracy for use in clinical practice. The objective was to evaluate the ability of a digital artificial intelligence (AI) assay (PDxBr) to enrich BC grading and improve risk categorization for predicting recurrence.
methodsIn our population-based longitudinal clinical development and validation study, we enrolled 2075 patients from Mount Sinai Hospital with infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast. With 3:1 balanced training and validation cohorts, patients were retrospectively followed for a median of 6 years. The main outcome was to validate an automated BC phenotyping system combined with clinical features to produce a binomial risk score predicting BC recurrence at diagnosis.
resultsThe PDxBr training model (n = 1559 patients) had a C-index of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.76-0.81) versus clinical 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74) and image feature models 0.72 (95% CI, 0.70-0.74). A risk score of 58 (scale 0-100) stratified patients as low or high risk, hazard ratio (HR) 5.5 (95% CI 4.19-7.2, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity 0.71, specificity 0.77, NPV 0.95, and PPV 0.32 for predicting BC recurrence within 6 years. In the validation cohort (n = 516), the C-index was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79) versus clinical 0.71 (95% CI 0.66-0.75) versus image feature models 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63-071). The validation cohort had an HR of 4.4 (95% CI 2.7-7.1, p < 0.001), sensitivity of 0.60, specificity 0.77, NPV 0.94, and PPV 0.24 for predicting BC recurrence within 6 years. PDxBr also improved Oncotype Recurrence Score (RS) performance: RS 31 cutoff, C-index of 0.36 (95% CI 0.26-0.45), sensitivity 37%, specificity 48%, HR 0.48, p = 0.04 versus Oncotype RS plus AI-grade C-index 0.72 (95% CI 0.67-0.79), sensitivity 78%, specificity 49%, HR 4.6, p < 0.001 versus Oncotype RS plus PDxBr, C-index 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82), sensitivity 67%, specificity 80%, HR 6.1, p < 0.001.
conclusionsPDxBr is a digital BC test combining automated AI-BC prognostic grade with clinical-pathologic features to predict the risk of early-stage BC recurrence. With future validation studies, we anticipate the PDxBr model will enrich current gene expression assays and enhance treatment decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.