Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539840›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

Evaluating the impact of Community-Based Sociotherapy on social dignity in post-genocide Rwanda: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Stefan Jansen, Japhet Niyonsenga, Chantal Marie Ingabire, Angela Jansen, Emmanuel Nzabonimpa, Noella Ingabire, Jeannette Kangabe, Emmanuel Sarabwe, Annemiek Richters, Theoneste Rutayisire and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan JansenMental Health & Behaviour Research Group, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Japhet NiyonsengaMental Health & Behaviour Research Group, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda. niyonsengajaphet74@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2429-2330
Chantal Marie IngabireCommunity-Based Sociotherapy, Kigali, Rwanda.
Angela JansenCommunity-Based Sociotherapy, Kigali, Rwanda.
Emmanuel NzabonimpaCommunity-Based Sociotherapy, Kigali, Rwanda.
Noella IngabireAnglican Church Rwanda, Byumba Diocese, Byumba, Rwanda.
Jeannette KangabePrison Fellowship Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Emmanuel SarabweCommunity-Based Sociotherapy, Kigali, Rwanda.
Annemiek RichtersCommunity-Based Sociotherapy, Kigali, Rwanda.
Theoneste RutayisireCommunity-Based Sociotherapy, Kigali, Rwanda.
Epaphrodite NsabimanaMental Health & Behaviour Research Group, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
University of Rwanda · RWRwanda Development Board · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-Based Sociotherapy (CBS) is an approach that was introduced in Rwanda in 2005, with the aim of improving psychosocial well-being among its participants and facilitating reconciliation processes. Over the years, CBS has been adapted contextually and the effectiveness of the approach has been measured in different ways, using qualitative and quantitative study designs. This study specifically assesses the effectiveness of CBS in terms of fostering the social dignity of participants as the primary outcome. METHODS/

designA cluster randomized controlled trial design with person-level outcomes whereas the CBS treatment is delivered at the cluster level. A total of 1200 eligible participants will be randomly assigned to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the intervention group will receive the CBS intervention, while the control group will be waitlisted. The primary outcome measure is a self-designed and psychometrically validated Social Dignity Scale. The secondary outcome measures will be the WHO (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), the Self-reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), and the perceived parental self-efficacy scale. The primary analysis will be performed following an intention to treat analysis, using generalized estimating equation modeling. DISCUSSION: We expect this cluster randomized controlled trial to provide insight into the effectiveness of CBS on social dignity and secondary psychosocial outcomes among its group participants, who have different socio-historical backgrounds including genocide survivors, perpetrators, bystanders and their descendants, people in conflicts (family/community), and local leaders. This study will inform CBS implementers, policymakers, practitioners, and other stakeholders on the role of social dignity in interventions that focus on psychosocial healing.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN11199072. It was registered on 2 April 2022.

Indexed as

GenocideRespectHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesCommunity-Based SociotherapyPsychosocialReconciliationSocial Dignity Scale

Identifiers

PMID36539840
PMCPMC9768903
OpenAlexW4312112990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.