Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539809›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2022

Morphologic design of nanostructures for enhanced antimicrobial activity.

Fatma Al-Zahraa Sayed, Noura G Eissa, Yidan Shen, David A Hunstad, Karen L Wooley, Mahmoud Elsabahy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Avian PathogenicVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bacterial responses toRSC advances · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatma Al-Zahraa SayedSchool of Biotechnology, Science Academy, Badr University in Cairo, Badr City, Cairo, 11829, Egypt.
Noura G EissaSchool of Biotechnology, Science Academy, Badr University in Cairo, Badr City, Cairo, 11829, Egypt.
Yidan ShenDepartments of Chemistry, Materials Science and Engineering, and Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77842, USA.
David A HunstadDepartments of Pediatrics and Molecular Microbiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. dhunstad@wustl.edu.
Karen L WooleyDepartments of Chemistry, Materials Science and Engineering, and Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77842, USA. wooley@chem.tamu.edu.
Mahmoud ElsabahySchool of Biotechnology, Science Academy, Badr University in Cairo, Badr City, Cairo, 11829, Egypt. mahmoud.elsabahy@buc.edu.eg.

Funding

Welch Foundation through the W. T. Doherty-Welch Chair in Chemistry A-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite significant progress in synthetic polymer chemistry and in control over tuning the structures and morphologies of nanoparticles, studies on morphologic design of nanomaterials for the purpose of optimizing antimicrobial activity have yielded mixed results. When designing antimicrobial materials, it is important to consider two distinctly different modes and mechanisms of activity-those that involve direct interactions with bacterial cells, and those that promote the entry of nanomaterials into infected host cells to gain access to intracellular pathogens. Antibacterial activity of nanoparticles may involve direct interactions with organisms and/or release of antibacterial cargo, and these activities depend on attractive interactions and contact areas between particles and bacterial or host cell surfaces, local curvature and dynamics of the particles, all of which are functions of nanoparticle shape. Bacteria may exist as spheres, rods, helices, or even in uncommon shapes (e.g., box- and star-shaped) and, furthermore, may transform into other morphologies along their lifespan. For bacteria that invade host cells, multivalent interactions are involved and are dependent upon bacterial size and shape. Therefore, mimicking bacterial shapes has been hypothesized to impact intracellular delivery of antimicrobial nanostructures. Indeed, designing complementarities between the shapes of microorganisms with nanoparticle platforms that are designed for antimicrobial delivery offers interesting new perspectives toward future nanomedicines. Some studies have reported improved antimicrobial activities with spherical shapes compared to non-spherical constructs, whereas other studies have reported higher activity for non-spherical structures (e.g., rod, discoid, cylinder, etc.). The shapes of nano- and microparticles have also been shown to impact their rates and extents of uptake by mammalian cells (macrophages, epithelial cells, and others). However, in most of these studies, nanoparticle morphology was not intentionally designed to mimic specific bacterial shape. Herein, the morphologic designs of nanoparticles that possess antimicrobial activities per se and those designed to deliver antimicrobial agent cargoes are reviewed. Furthermore, hypotheses beyond shape dependence and additional factors that help to explain apparent discrepancies among studies are highlighted.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsNanoparticlesNanostructuresAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBiological TransportMammalsPolymersAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsPolymersAntimicrobialBacteriaBiomimicryMorphologyNanoparticlesShape design

Identifiers

PMID36539809
PMCPMC9768920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.