ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2022
Tracheal airway pressure in tracheostomy tube capping trials: an experimental study.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTracheostomy tube capping is a commonly used test to determine if the tracheostomy tube can be removed. The success of the capping trial depends on the patient's ability to maintain sufficient spontaneous breathing with an occluded tracheostomy tube. The impact of an occluded tracheotomy tube on airway resistance is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate tracheal pressure during capping or stoma button insertion and potential determinants concerning cuff.
methodsEight cuffed and uncuffed tracheostomy tubes and three stoma buttons of various manufacturers and sizes were inserted into the trachea model. Cuffs were completely deflated or contained atmospheric pressure. The trachea was ventilated bidirectional with a respirator in volume-controlled mode and volume flows 15-60 L/min. Tracheal pressure drop during inspiration as a parameter of pressure required to move gas through the airway was measured.
resultsTracheal pressure drops occurred linearly or irregularly during capping trials to a maximum of 4.2 kPa at flow rates of 60 L/min for atmospheric pressure cuffs. In tracheostomy tubes with completely deflated cuffs, pressure drop in the trachea reaches a maximum of 3.4 kPa at a flow rate of 60 L/min. For tracheostomy tubes with cuff smaller inner or outer diameters do not regularly result in lower tracheal pressure drop. The pressure drop varies between different tracheostomy tubes depending on the manufacturer. In cuffed tracheostomy tubes, we observed three phenomena: sail-like positioning, folding over, and tightening of the cuff during flow. The maximum tracheal pressure drop during stoma button insertion reaches 0.014 kPa.
conclusionsThe cuff is a central element for the pressure drop in the airway and thus airway resistance during spontaneous translaryngeal breathing with a capped TT. Complete deflation reduces the pressure drop in the trachea. Due to deformation of the cuff, measured pressures are irregular as the volume flow is increased. Incomplete deflated cuffs and material characteristics of tracheostomy tubes and cuffs in addition to anatomical and clinical variables may cause unsuccessful capping trials due to increased airway resistance. All stoma buttons showed that pressure drop and thus airway resistance due to stoma buttons has no clinical relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.