Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539758›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

How effective is the health promotion policy in Sichuan, China: based on the PMC-Index model and field evaluation.

Yanlin Yang, Jing Tang, Zhixin Li, Jin Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yanlin Yang *Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jing Tang *Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Zhixin LiSichuan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Jin WenInstitute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. huaxiwenjin@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 71874115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany countries around the world highlight the health in all policies (HiAP). However, most of the related research focused on the influential factors and implementation strategies, with less concern on the evaluation of HiAP. In response to HiAP's call, the Chinese government has proposed health promotion policies (HPPs) in counties or districts, the evaluation of HPPs in sample counties or districts of Sichuan province in China is an essential basis for optimizing policy content, improving policy implementation, and ensuring health promotion's continuous and efficient operation.

methodsThis paper established an evaluation system for HPPs based on the PMC-Index model and then quantitatively analyzed 37 representative HPPs from the pilot areas in Sichuan province. In addition, a team of experts conducted a field assessment.

resultsThe results showed that the average PMC index of 37 HPPs was 7.091, and correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between the PMC index and expert score.

conclusionsThis study indicates that the overall consistency of HPPs was good and proves a connection between the formulation and implementation of HPPs.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealth PromotionChinaGovernmentHumansSuccinimidesN-succinimidyl-3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)propionateSuccinimidesCorrelation analysisExpert field evaluationsHealth promotion policyPMC-Index model

Identifiers

PMID36539758
PMCPMC9764584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.