Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539747›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2022

Everywhere and for everyone: proportionate universalism as a framework for equitable access to community drug checking.

Bruce Wallace, Thea van Roode, Piotr Burek, Dennis Hore, Bernadette Pauly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruce WallaceCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada. barclay@uvic.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-7302
Thea van RoodeCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Piotr BurekCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Dennis HoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Bernadette PaulyCanadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), University of Victoria, P.O. Box 1700, STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIllicit drug overdoses have reached unprecedented levels, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses are needed that address the increasingly potent and unpredictable drug supply with better reach to a wide population at risk for overdose. Drug checking is a potential response offered mainly within existing harm reduction services, but strategies are needed to increase reach and improve equitable delivery of drug checking services.

methodsThe purpose of this qualitative study was to explore how to extend the reach of drug checking services to a wide population at risk of overdose. We conducted 26 in-depth interviews with potential service users to identify barriers to service use and strategies to increase equitable delivery of drug checking services. Our analysis was informed by theoretical perspectives on equity, and themes were developed relevant to equitable delivery through attention to quality dimensions of service use: accessibility, appropriateness, effectiveness, safety, and respect.

resultsBarriers to equitable service delivery included criminalization and stigma, geographic and access issues, and lack of cultural appropriateness that deter service use for a broad population with diverse needs. Strategies to enhance equitable access include 1ocating services widely throughout communities, integrating drug checking within existing health care services, reframing away from risk messaging, engaging peers from a broad range of backgrounds, and using discrete methods of delivery to help create safer spaces and better reach diverse populations at risk for overdose.

conclusionsWe propose proportionate universalism in drug checking as a guiding framework for the implementation of community drug checking as an equity-oriented harm reduction intervention and as a population health response. Both a universal equity-oriented approach and multiple tailored approaches are required to facilitate drug checking services that maximize reach and appropriateness to respond to diverse needs.

Indexed as

COVID-19Drug OverdoseHarm ReductionHumansPandemicsDrug checkingFentanylHarm reductionHealth equityHealth quality dimensionsOverdoseProportionate universalismSubstance use

Identifiers

PMID36539747
PMCPMC9763810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.