Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539742›Full record

ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2022

Health facility users' knowledge, perceptions, and practices about infant feeding in the context of option B+ in South Africa: a qualitative study.

Duduzile Faith Nsibande, Vuyolwethu Magasana, Wanga Zembe, Gurpreet Kindra, Mary Mogashoa, Ameena Goga, Vundli Ramokolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Duduzile Faith NsibandeHealth Systems Research Unit (HSRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa. Duduzile.Nsibande@mrc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-3388
Vuyolwethu MagasanaHealth Systems Research Unit (HSRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa.
Wanga ZembeHealth Systems Research Unit (HSRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa.
Gurpreet KindraUnited States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mary MogashoaUnited States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ameena GogaHealth Systems Research Unit (HSRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa.
Vundli RamokoloHealth Systems Research Unit (HSRU), South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Medical Research Council · ZACenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U2G GH001150PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV and sub-optimal infant feeding practices remain important threats to child growth, development, and survival in low- and middle-income countries. To our knowledge, few studies have explored health service users' perspective of infant feeding in the context of WHO Option B+ policy to prevent vertical HIV transmission (PMTCT). This paper is a sub-analysis of qualitative data from a mixed-methods multi-level process evaluation of Option B+ implementation in South Africa (SA). In this study we explored health facility users' infant feeding knowledge, perceptions, and practices one year after SA adopted the 2016 updated World Health Organization prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV Option B+ infant feeding guidelines.

methodsNineteen focus group discussions (FGDs) were held with six groups of men and women whose infants were aged < 6 months. Participants were attending randomly selected primary health care facilities within six purposively selected priority districts. The six groups included in the FGDs were: (i) adolescent girls and young women living with HIV (WHIV), (ii) adolescent girls and young women not living with HIV (WNHIV), (iii) older postnatal WHIV (iv) older postnatal WNHIV (v) pregnant women, and (vi) men. Data collection took place between April and December 2018. Data analysis involved coding and thematic framework analysis.

resultsWomen and men have suboptimal knowledge of the recommended breastfeeding duration and exclusive breastfeeding, especially for HIV-exposed infants. Most women received sub-optimal infant feeding counselling and mixed messages from health care workers. Fewer WHIV initiated breastfeeding at birth compared to WNHIV. Most parents believed that HIV-exposed infants should be breastfed for 6 months and many postnatal women on antiretroviral drugs and younger mothers lacked confidence to breastfeed beyond 6 months. Mixed feeding was predominant among all women due to individual, family, and socio-structural barriers. Many men were supportive on infant feeding; however, they lacked the appropriate information and skills to influence their partners' infant feeding decisions.

conclusionsDifferences in breastfeeding practices between WHIV and WNHIV are highly influenced by the lack of knowledge of infant feeding policy recommendations. Multiple-level factors deter many mothers from adhering to recommended guidelines. Appropriate ongoing infant feeding counselling and breastfeeding support are required for women and their partners.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHIV InfectionsAdolescentFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalePregnancySouth AfricaBreastfeedingExclusive breastfeedingInfant feedingMixed feedingOption B +Policy (6).

Identifiers

PMID36539742
PMCPMC9764699
OpenAlexW4313436131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.