ArticleBMC ophthalmology2022
Assessment of outer retinal thickness and function in mice after experimental optic nerve trauma.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chronic exposure to aerosolized Arizona test dust reduces visual acuity in mice.Toxicology reports · 2026Article
- Arylphthalide Delays Diabetic Retinopathy via Immunomodulating the Early Inflammatory Response in an Animal Model of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Context-Dependent Effects of the Ketogenic Diet on Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival and Axonal Regeneration After Optic Nerve Injury.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2023Article
- Assessment of the uniform field electroretinogram for mouse retinal ganglion cell functional analysis.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptic nerve trauma caused by crush injury is frequently used for investigating experimental treatments that protect retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and induce axonal regrowth. Retaining outer retinal light responses is essential for therapeutic rescue of RGCs after injury. However, whether optic nerve crush also damages the structure or function of photoreceptors has not been systematically investigated. In this study, we investigated whether outer retinal thickness and visual function are altered by optic nerve crush in the mouse.
methodsWildtype mice underwent optic nerve crush and intravitreal injection of a control solution in one eye with the fellow eye remaining uninjured. Two weeks after injury, the thickness of the ganglion cell region (GCL to IPL) and photoreceptor layer (bottom of the OPL to top of the RPE) were measured using OCT. Retinal function was assessed using flash ERGs. Immunodetection of RGCs was performed on retinal cryosections and RGCs and ONL nuclei rows were counted. Multiple comparison analyses were conducted using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test and P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
resultsOptic nerve crush injury induced RGC death as expected, demonstrated by thinning of the ganglion cell region and RGC loss. In contrast, outer retinal thickness, photopic and scotopic a-wave and b-wave amplitudes and photoreceptor nuclei counts, were equivalent between injured and uninjured eyes.
conclusionsSecondary degeneration of the outer retina was not detected after optic nerve injury in the presence of significant RGC death, suggesting that the retina has the capacity to compartmentalize damage. These findings also indicate that experimental treatments to preserve the GCL and rescue vision using this optic nerve injury model would not require additional strategies to preserve the ONL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.