ArticleBMC neurology2022
The REACT study: design of a randomized phase 3 trial to assess the efficacy and safety of clazosentan for preventing deterioration due to delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03585270 (A Prospective, Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Clazosentan in Preventing Clinical Deterioration Due to Delayed Cerebral Ischemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective, Multi-center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Clazosentan in Preventing Clinical Deterioration Due to Delayed Cerebral Ischemia (DCI), in Adult Subjects With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH)
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post-traumatic vasospasm: Epidemiology, specificities, risk factors, and therapeutics.Journal of intensive medicine · 2025Review
- Beyond the bleed: complications after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Pathophysiology, clinical implications, and management strategies: a review.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Japanese Nationwide Questionnaire Survey on the Treatment and Management of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Due to Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Outcomes Measures in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research.Translational stroke research · 2025Review
- Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia in the aftermath of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a comprehensive analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Contemporary management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. An update for the intensivist.Intensive care medicine · 2024Review
- Factors Influencing Discontinuation of Clazosentan Therapy in Elderly Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study from a Japanese Single Center.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024Observational
- Cardiopulmonary Events of the Elderly (≥75 Years) during Clazosentan Therapy after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Stroke Center in Japan.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Clinical Value of Serum Secretoneurin Levels in Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia and Prognostic Analysis of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical management of a ruptured intracranial aneurysm.Frontiers in stroke · 2024Review
- Current and future strategies for targeting the endothelin pathway in cardiovascular disease.Nature cardiovascular research · 2023Review
- Japanese nationwide questionnaire survey on delayed cerebral infarction due to vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients presenting with an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The REACT study is designed to assess the safety and efficacy of clazosentan in preventing clinical deterioration due to DCI in patients with aSAH.
methodsREACT is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study that is planned to enroll 400 patients with documented aSAH from a ruptured cerebral aneurysm, randomized 1:1 to 15 mg/hour intravenous clazosentan vs. placebo, in approximately 100 sites and 15 countries. Eligible patients are required to present at hospital admission with CT evidence of significant subarachnoid blood, defined as a thick and diffuse clot that is more than 4 mm in thickness and involves 3 or more basal cisterns. The primary efficacy endpoint is the occurrence of clinical deterioration due to DCI up to 14 days post-study drug initiation. The main secondary endpoint is the occurrence of clinically relevant cerebral infarction at Day 16 post-study drug initiation. Other secondary endpoints include the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) score at Week 12 post-aSAH, dichotomized into poor and good outcome. Radiological results and clinical endpoints are centrally evaluated by independent committees, blinded to treatment allocation. Exploratory efficacy endpoints comprise the assessment of cognition status at 12 weeks and quality of life at 12 and 24 weeks post aSAH. DISCUSSION: In the REACT study, clazosentan is evaluated on top of standard of care to determine if it reduces the risk of clinical deterioration due to DCI after aSAH. The selection of patients with thick and diffuse clots is intended to assess the benefit/risk profile of clazosentan in a population at high risk of vasospasm-related ischemic complications post-aSAH. TRIAL REGISTRATION (ADDITIONAL FILE 1): ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03585270). EU Clinical Trial Register (EudraCT Number: 2018-000241-39).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.