Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539533›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2023

Functional brain networks in the evaluation of patients with neurodegenerative disorders.

Matej Perovnik, Tomaž Rus, Katharina A Schindlbeck, David Eidelberg

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Dual-tracer [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Eagle eyes on the human brain and beyond: PET at ultra-high spatial resolution.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Variation in high-amplitude events across the human lifespan.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matej Perovnik *Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomaž Rus *Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Katharina A SchindlbeckCenter for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA.
David EidelbergCenter for Neurosciences, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA. deidelberg@northwell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0854-864X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network analytical tools are increasingly being applied to brain imaging maps of resting metabolic activity (PET) or blood oxygenation-dependent signals (functional MRI) to characterize the abnormal neural circuitry that underlies brain diseases. This approach is particularly valuable for the study of neurodegenerative disorders, which are characterized by stereotyped spread of pathology along discrete neural pathways. Identification and validation of disease-specific brain networks facilitate the quantitative assessment of pathway changes over time and during the course of treatment. Network abnormalities can often be identified before symptom onset and can be used to track disease progression even in the preclinical period. Likewise, network activity can be modulated by treatment and might therefore be used as a marker of efficacy in clinical trials. Finally, early differential diagnosis can be achieved by simultaneously measuring the activity levels of multiple disease networks in an individual patient's scans. Although these techniques were originally developed for PET, over the past several years analogous methods have been introduced for functional MRI, a more accessible non-invasive imaging modality. This advance is expected to broaden the application of network tools to large and diverse patient populations.

Indexed as

BrainNeurodegenerative DiseasesBrain MappingDisease ProgressionHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.