Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539524›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Towards improving e-commerce customer review analysis for sentiment detection.

Upendra Singh, Anant Saraswat, Hiteshwar Kumar Azad, Kumar Abhishek, S Shitharth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Upendra Singh *National Institute of Technology Patna, CSE, Patna, 800006, India.
Anant Saraswat *National Institute of Technology Patna, CSE, Patna, 800006, India.
Hiteshwar Kumar Azad *Vellore Institute of Technology, SCOPE, Vellore, 632001, India.
Kumar Abhishek *National Institute of Technology Patna, CSE, Patna, 800006, India.
S Shitharth *Kebri Dehar University, CSE, 001, Kebri Dehar, Ethiopia. ShitharthS@kdu.edu.et.
National Institute of Technology Patna · INAmhara Regional Agricultural Research Institute · ETVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to a report published by Business Wire, the market value of e-commerce reached US$ 13 trillion and is expected to reach US$ 55.6 trillion by 2027. In this rapidly growing market, product and service reviews can influence our purchasing decisions. It is challenging to manually evaluate reviews to make decisions and examine business models. However, users can examine and automate this process with Natural Language Processing (NLP). NLP is a well-known technique for evaluating and extracting information from written or audible texts. NLP research investigates the social architecture of societies. This article analyses the Amazon dataset using various combinations of voice components and deep learning. The suggested module focuses on identifying sentences as 'Positive', 'Neutral', 'Negative', or 'Indifferent'. It analyses the data and labels the 'better' and 'worse' assumptions as positive and negative, respectively. With the expansion of the internet and e-commerce websites over the past decade, consumers now have a vast selection of products within the same domain, and NLP plays a vital part in classifying products based on evaluations. It is possible to predict sponsored and unpaid reviews using NLP with Machine Learning. This article examined various Machine Learning algorithms for predicting the sentiment of e-commerce website reviews. The automation achieves a maximum validation accuracy of 79.83% when using Fast Text as word embedding and the Multi-channel Convolution Neural Network.

Indexed as

AttitudeCommerceAlgorithmsLanguageNatural Language ProcessingNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID36539524
PMCPMC9764295
OpenAlexW4311963445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.