Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539387›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2023

Uncertainty quantification of reference-based cellular deconvolution algorithms.

Dorothea Seiler Vellame, Gemma Shireby, Ailsa MacCalman, Emma L Dempster, Joe Burrage, Tyler Gorrie-Stone, Leonard S Schalkwyk, Jonathan Mill, Eilis Hannon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms underlying end-organ injury in sleep apnoea.The European respiratory journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dorothea Seiler VellameUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-0474
Gemma ShirebyUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-0080
Ailsa MacCalmanUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.
Emma L DempsterUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1257-5314
Joe BurrageUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.
Tyler Gorrie-StoneSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1817-1495
Leonard S SchalkwykSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7030-5756
Jonathan MillUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1115-3224
Eilis HannonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter EX2 5DW, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6840-072X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/K013807/1Medical Research Council MR/M008924/1Medical Research Council MR/R005176/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of epigenetic epidemiology studies to date have generated genome-wide profiles from bulk tissues (e.g., whole blood) however these are vulnerable to confounding from variation in cellular composition. Proxies for cellular composition can be mathematically derived from the bulk tissue profiles using a deconvolution algorithm; however, there is no method to assess the validity of these estimates for a dataset where the true cellular proportions are unknown. In this study, we describe, validate and characterize a sample level accuracy metric for derived cellular heterogeneity variables. The CETYGO score captures the deviation between a sample's DNA methylation profile and its expected profile given the estimated cellular proportions and cell type reference profiles. We demonstrate that the CETYGO score consistently distinguishes inaccurate and incomplete deconvolutions when applied to reconstructed whole blood profiles. By applying our novel metric to >6,300 empirical whole blood profiles, we find that estimating accurate cellular composition is influenced by both technical and biological variation. In particular, we show that when using a common reference panel for whole blood, less accurate estimates are generated for females, neonates, older individuals and smokers. Our results highlight the utility of a metric to assess the accuracy of cellular deconvolution, and describe how it can enhance studies of DNA methylation that are reliant on statistical proxies for cellular heterogeneity. To facilitate incorporating our methodology into existing pipelines, we have made it freely available as an R package (https://github.com/ds420/CETYGO).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA MethylationComputational BiologyEpigenomicsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornUncertaintycellular heterogeneityDNA methylationepigenetic epidemiologyillumina 450K arrayIllumina EPIC array

Identifiers

PMID36539387
PMCPMC9980651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.