Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539057›Full record

Observational studyFertility and sterility2023

The type of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine does not affect ovarian function in assisted reproduction cycle.

Antonio Requena, Vanessa Vergara, Cristina González-Ravina, Maria Eugenia Ruiz, María Cruz

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Fertility and sterility, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Female reproduction and abnormal uterine bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Antonio RequenaReproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad-RMA Global Headquarters Madrid, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: Antonio.Requena@ivirma.com.
Vanessa VergaraReproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad-RMA Global Headquarters Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina González-RavinaReproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad-RMA Global Headquarters Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Andrology Lab, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Maria Eugenia RuizReproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad-RMA Global Headquarters Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
María CruzReproductive Medicine, Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad-RMA Global Headquarters Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Valencian Infertility Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether vaccination or the type of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 affects ovarian function in an assisted reproduction treatment.

designA retrospective and observational study.

settingUniversity-affiliated private in vitro fertilization (IVF) center. PATIENT(S): Five hundred one patients who had received the complete vaccination schedule. INTERVENTION(S): Treatment before and after vaccination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Parameters for both reproductive outcomes and IVF results in patients vaccinated RESULT(S): We included 510 patients, distributed as follows: 13.5% (n = 69) received a viral vector vaccine, either the adenovirus serotype 26 vector vaccine (Ad26.CoV2.S; Janssen; n = 31) or the chimpanzee adenovirus vector vaccine (ChAdOx; AstraZeneca; n = 38). The remaining 86.5% (n = 441) received an messenger RNA vaccine from either Pfizer-BioNTech (n = 336) or Moderna (n = 105). Sample size for the unexposed women was n = 1190. No differences were found in any of the evaluated parameters for both reproductive outcomes and IVF results in patients vaccinated with any adenovirus or messenger RNA vaccine. When we compared the results after vaccination with different types of vaccines between the exposed and unexposed groups, and similar results were obtained in the days of stimulation or the doses of administered follicle stimulating hormone. Finally, the numbers of oocytes were as follows: Johnson & Johnson (9.2 ± 2.6), AstraZeneca (7.7 ± 1.2), Moderna (11.3 ± 1.8), Pfizer (12.6 ± 1.0), and the unvaccinated group (10.2 ± 1.5), P=0.057. CONCLUSION(S): These early results suggest no measurable detrimental effect on reproductive outcomes, regardless of the type of vaccine received.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesFertilization in VitroOvaryAd26COVS1ChAdOx1 nCoV-19FemaleHumansReproductionRetrospective StudiesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAd26COVS1ChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesRNA, Messengeradenovirus vaccinemRNA vaccineovarian functionSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36539057
PMCPMC9758069
OpenAlexW4312114630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.