Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36539002›Full record

ReviewClinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association2023

Emerging Tests for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Marina Hanna, Neelendu Dey, William M Grady

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Investigating stage-specific metabolic alterations in colorectal cancer through urine metabolomics.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marina HannaDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Neelendu DeyDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington; Microbiome Research Initiative, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: ndey@fredhutch.org.
William M GradyDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: wgrady@fredhutch.org.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Understanding adenoma progression: Interplay among tissue microenvironment, clonal architecture, and gut microbiomeU54CA274374 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI Kristina A. Matkowskyj · 2022 to 2026
$10.7M
Biomarkers for optimizing risk prediction and early detection of cancers of the colon and esophagusU2CCA271902 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER · PI William Mallory Grady, Cecilia C Yeung · 2022 to 2026
$5.3M
NCI NIH HHS U2C CA271902NCI NIH HHS U54 CA274374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is among the most common cancers globally and a major cause of cancer-related deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that CRC will kill 1 in 60 Americans, and CRC screening is recommended for all Americans ≥45 years of age. Current CRC screening methods are effective for preventing CRC and have been shown to reduce CRC-related mortality. However, none of the currently available tests is ideal, and many people are not compliant with screening recommendations. Novel screening tests based on advances in CRC molecular biology, genetics, and epigenetics, combined with developments in sequencing technologies and computational analytic methods, have been developed to address the shortcomings of current CRC screening tests. These emerging tests include blood-based assays that use plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA and serum proteins to detect early CRC and advanced adenomas, assays that use stool DNA or mRNA, and methods for profiling the gut microbiome. Here we review current screening modalities, and we discuss the principles behind the most promising emerging CRC screening tests and the data supporting their potential to be used in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColorectal NeoplasmsColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerHumansMass ScreeningCirculating Tumor DNAColorectal CancerEpigeneticsGeneticsMicrobiomeScreening

Identifiers

PMID36539002
PMCPMC9974876
OpenAlexW4313372155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.