Evidence map›Paper›PMID 3653889›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1987

A comparative mapping study of fragile sites in the human and murine genomes.

M Djalali, S Adolph, P Steinbach, H Winking, H Hameister

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fragile sites in human and Macaca fascicularis chromosomes are breakpoints in chromosome evolution.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2002
    Article
  7. Sequence conservation at human and mouse orthologous common fragile regions, FRA3B/FHIT and Fra14A2/Fhit.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2001
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preferential integration of marker DNA into the chromosomal fragile site at 3p14: an approach to cloning fragile sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 1991
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M DjalaliAbteilung Klinische Genetik der Universität Ulm, Federal Republic of Germany.
S Adolph
P Steinbach
H Winking
H Hameister
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fragile sites on murine chromosomes were induced by the antimetabolites methotrexate (MTX), fluorodeoxyuridine (FdU), and aphidicolin (APD). To facilitate chromosome identification the analysis was performed on chromosomes of a CD/CD mouse that possesses nine pairs of Robertsonian translocation chromosomes of known arm composition. The pattern of induced fragile sites was rather similar for the different antimetabolites used. Many of them, e.g., 2B, 3B, 5B and 9D, are included in Giemsa-negative bands. On the X chromosome a fragile site was mapped to the region XC/D. Comparative mapping data with human fragile sites have been informative in most instances. Conservation of synteny within known linkage groups seems very likely.

Indexed as

Chromosome FragilityChromosome MappingAnimalsAntimetabolitesChromosome BandingChromosome Fragile SitesHumansKaryotypingMiceSpecies SpecificityAntimetabolites

Identifiers

PMID3653889
OpenAlexW2028145193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.