Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538564›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A qualitative study of organisational resilience in care homes in Scotland.

Alastair Ross, Janet E Anderson, Santhani Selveindran, Tamsin MacBride, Paul Bowie, Andrea Sherriff, Linda Young, Evie Fioratou, Edel Roddy, Heather Edwards and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Organizational Resilience in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alastair RossGlasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2952-3182
Janet E AndersonDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Monash, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-8370
Santhani SelveindranCambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3734-1189
Tamsin MacBrideSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0089-779X
Paul BowieNHS Education for Scotland, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Andrea SherriffGlasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Linda YoungNHS Education for Scotland, Inverness, United Kingdom.
Evie FioratouCentre for Undergraduate Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.
Edel RoddySchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Heather EdwardsThe Care Inspectorate, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Belinda DewarSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Lorna M MacphersonGlasgow Dental School, School of Medicine, Dentistry & Nursing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing care for the dependent older person is complex and there have been persistent concerns about care quality as well as a growing recognition of the need for systems approaches to improvement. The I-SCOPE (Improving Systems of Care for the Older person) project employed Resilient Healthcare (RHC) theory and the CARE (Concepts for Applying Resilience) Model to study how care organisations adapt to complexity in everyday work, with the aim of exploring how to support resilient performance. The project was an in-depth qualitative study across multiple sites over 24 months. There were: 68 hours of non-participant observation, shadowing care staff at work and starting broad before narrowing to observe care domains of interest; n = 33 recorded one-to-one interviews (32 care staff and one senior inspector); three focus groups (n = 19; two with inspectors and one multi-disciplinary group); and five round table discussions on emergent results at a final project workshop (n = 31). All interviews and discussion groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Resident and family interviews (n = 8) were facilitated through use of emotional touchpoints. Analysis using QSR NVivo 12.0 focused on a) capturing everyday work in terms of the interplay between demand and capacity, adaptations and intended and unintended outcomes and b) a higher-level thematic description (care planning and use of information; coordination of everyday care activity; providing person-centred care) which gives an overview of resilient performance and how it might be enhanced. This gives important new insight for improvement. Conclusions are that resilience can be supported through more efficient use of information, supporting flexible adaptation, coordination across care domains, design of the physical environment, and family involvement based on realistic conversations about quality of life.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareQuality of LifeAgedFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchScotland

Identifiers

PMID36538564
PMCPMC9767361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.