Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538502›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Rapid and predictable genome evolution across three hybrid ant populations.

Pierre Nouhaud, Simon H Martin, Beatriz Portinha, Vitor C Sousa, Jonna Kulmuni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetics and genomics of hybridization.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Genome evolution is surprisingly predictable after initial hybridization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierre NouhaudOrganismal & Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4923-0993
Simon H MartinInstitute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Beatriz PortinhaOrganismal & Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Vitor C SousacE3c, Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Department of Animal Biology, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jonna KulmuniOrganismal & Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-8852-0793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization is frequent in the wild but it is unclear when admixture events lead to predictable outcomes and if so, at what timescale. We show that selection led to correlated sorting of genetic variation rapidly after admixture in 3 hybrid Formica aquilonia × F. polyctena ant populations. Removal of ancestry from the species with the lowest effective population size happened in all populations, consistent with purging of deleterious load. This process was modulated by recombination rate variation and the density of functional sites. Moreover, haplotypes with signatures of positive selection in either species were more likely to fix in hybrids. These mechanisms led to mosaic genomes with comparable ancestry proportions. Our work demonstrates predictable evolution over short timescales after admixture in nature.

Indexed as

AntsGenetics, PopulationAnimalsEvolution, MolecularGenomeHybridization, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID36538502
PMCPMC9767332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.