Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538363›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2022

Boosting Delirium Identification Accuracy With Sentiment-Based Natural Language Processing: Mixed Methods Study.

Lu Wang, Yilun Zhang, Mark Chignell, Baizun Shan, Kathleen A Sheehan, Fahad Razak, Amol Verma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Identifying Symptoms of Delirium from Clinical Narratives Using Natural Language Processing.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improving Patient Safety Event Report Classification with Machine Learning and Contextual Text Representation.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual meeting · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lu WangDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4016-4096
Yilun ZhangDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0682-0961
Mark ChignellDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-6905
Baizun ShanDepartment of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6204-7814
Kathleen A SheehanGEMINI - The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8700-0809
Fahad RazakGEMINI - The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-7286
Amol VermaGEMINI - The General Medicine Inpatient Initiative, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6857-931X
University of Toronto · CATexas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is an acute neurocognitive disorder that affects up to half of older hospitalized medical patients and can lead to dementia, longer hospital stays, increased health costs, and death. Although delirium can be prevented and treated, it is difficult to identify and predict.

objectiveThis study aimed to improve machine learning models that retrospectively identify the presence of delirium during hospital stays (eg, to measure the effectiveness of delirium prevention interventions) by using the natural language processing (NLP) technique of sentiment analysis (in this case a feature that identifies sentiment toward, or away from, a delirium diagnosis).

methodsUsing data from the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative, a Canadian hospital data and analytics network, a detailed manual review of medical records was conducted from nearly 4000 admissions at 6 Toronto area hospitals. Furthermore, 25.74% (994/3862) of the eligible hospital admissions were labeled as having delirium. Using the data set collected from this study, we developed machine learning models with, and without, the benefit of NLP methods applied to diagnostic imaging reports, and we asked the question "can NLP improve machine learning identification of delirium?"

resultsAmong the eligible 3862 hospital admissions, 994 (25.74%) admissions were labeled as having delirium. Identification and calibration of the models were satisfactory. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the main model with NLP in the independent testing data set were 0.807 and 0.930, respectively. The accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the main model without NLP in the independent testing data set were 0.811 and 0.869, respectively. Model performance was also found to be stable over the 5-year period used in the experiment, with identification for a likely future holdout test set being no worse than identification for retrospective holdout test sets.

conclusionsOur machine learning model that included NLP (ie, sentiment analysis in medical image description text mining) produced valid identification of delirium with the sentiment analysis, providing significant additional benefit over the model without NLP.

Indexed as

data miningdelirium diagnosismedical image descriptionsentiment analysistext mining and analysis

Identifiers

PMID36538363
PMCPMC9812273
OpenAlexW4296333258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.