Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538250›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2023

Implementation of Psychosocial Screening into Diabetes Clinics: Experience from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network.

Sarah Corathers, Desireé N Williford, Jessica Kichler, Laura Smith, Emma Ospelt, Saketh Rompicherla, Alissa Roberts, Priya Prahalad, Marina Basina, Cynthia Muñoz and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sarah CorathersCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA. sarah.corathers@cchmc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7019-278X
Desireé N WillifordCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jessica KichlerUniversity of Windsor, Windsor, Canada.
Laura SmithCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Emma OspeltT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Saketh RompicherlaT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.
Alissa RobertsSeattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA.
Priya PrahaladStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Marina BasinaStanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Cynthia MuñozKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Osagie EbekozienT1D Exchange, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAlthough advances in diabetes technology and pharmacology have significantly and positively impacted diabetes management and health outcomes for some, diabetes care remains burdensome and can be challenging to balance with other life priorities. The purpose of this article is to review the rationale for assessment of psychosocial domains in diabetes care settings and strategies for the implementation of psychosocial screening into routine practice. Survey data from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network is highlighted. RECENT

findingsImplementation of psychosocial screening requires identifying the population; selecting validated tools to assess target domains; determining frequency of screening and mode of survey delivery; and scoring, interpreting, documenting, and facilitating referrals such that these processes are part of clinical workflows. Recognizing the influence of psychosocial factors for people with diabetes (PWD), professional society guidelines for comprehensive diabetes care recommend the integration of psychosocial screening into routine care.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansMass ScreeningQuality Improvement

Identifiers

PMID36538250
PMCPMC9763798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.