Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538186›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2022

Comparison of genotyping by sequencing procedures to determine population genetic structure.

Dilini K Abeyrama, Brian Boyle, Theresa M Burg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Arguments for and against the whole-genome sequencing of newborns.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dilini K AbeyramaUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada. dilini.abeyrama@uleth.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9724-3708
Brian BoyleUniversité Laval, Québec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-1463
Theresa M BurgUniversity of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5096-3479
University of Lethbridge · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in technology over the past few decades have resulted in the development of genome sequencing at lower costs. Protocols, costs, and the amount of data produced by different sequencing technologies are highly variable. Ion Torrent and Illumina sequencing instruments are two sequencing technologies which use very similar library preparation procedures. Enzymatic combinations can be changed in genotyping by sequencing (GbS) library protocols without significant adjustments. To compare the outputs from two different GbS procedures, we sequenced samples of two sister species of yellow-nosed albatross collected at multiple geographic locations. The data sets involving different sequencing instruments and enzymatic combinations were analysed using the Stacks pipeline and aligned to the same reference genome. Both procedures identified the same genetic clusters separating Atlantic and Indian yellow-nosed albatross and substructure within Indian yellow-nosed albatross.

Indexed as

GenomeGenotyping TechniquesChromosome MappingGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideIllumina NovaSeqIon Torrent ProtonPaired-endRestriction enzymeSingle-end

Identifiers

PMID36538186
OpenAlexW4312094031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.