Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538103›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2023

Revision rates of flow- versus pressure-regulated ventricular shunt valves for the treatment of hydrocephalus in neonates following germinal matrix haemorrhage-a retrospective review.

Thomas Mulcahy, Norman Ma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas MulcahyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Drthomasmulcahy@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1764-5468
Norman MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNeonates with ventricular shunts inserted for hydrocephalus following germinal matrix haemorrhage (GMH) have high rates of shunt revision. The shunt valve plays a key role in regulating the function of the shunt. In this study, we aim to determine if the choice of flow-regulated or pressure-regulated valve used in the initial implantation of a shunt affects the rate of shunt revision.

methodsA retrospective cohort comparison study was performed on 34 neonates with hydrocephalus following GMH who underwent placement of a ventricular shunt at the Queensland Children's Hospital from November 2014 to June 2020. The primary outcome examined was the need for revision or replacement of the ventricular shunt after successful initial placement within 2 years of implantation. The secondary outcome examined was the survival time of the shunt.

results16 patients had placement of a flow-regulated valve, and 18 patients had placement of a pressure-regulated valve. 14 (87.5%) patients with flow-regulated valves required replacement during the follow-up period. 2 (18.18%) patients with a fixed pressure regulated underwent revision, while 2 (28.57%) programmable pressure-regulated shunts required revision. Patients that had a flow-regulated valve had a statistically significant higher rate of revision compared to those who had a pressure-regulated valve, (87.5% flow vs 22.22% pressure) with a P-value of < 0.001. Valve obstruction was also more common in patients with flow-regulated valves than pressure-regulated valves (4 vs 0) with a P-value of 0.010. Overall mean median survival time was 22.06 months, shunts with flow-regulated valves had a shorter median survival time of 3.19 months compared with over 24 months for pressure-regulated valves with a P-value of < 0.001.

conclusionOur study suggests that the initial implantation of flow-regulated valves may carry an increased total rate of shunt revision and valve obstruction within the first 2 years following implantation compared to pressure-regulated valves in patients with hydrocephalus following GMH.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusCerebral HemorrhageCerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsChildHumansInfant, NewbornRetrospective StudiesVentriculoperitoneal ShuntGerminal matrix haemorrhageHydrocephalusIntraventricular haemorrhageNeonateVentricular shunt

Identifiers

PMID36538103
OpenAlexW4312018996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.