Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538081›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2023

Medicolegal considerations associated with cancer during pregnancy.

Miltiadis Tembelis, Katherine C Frederick-Dyer, J Logan Dyer, Virginia B Planz, Mariam Moshiri

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miltiadis TembelisDepartment of Radiology, NYU Langone Hospital Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA. Tembelismd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-8054
Katherine C Frederick-DyerDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
J Logan Dyer, Brentwood, TN, 37027, USA.
Virginia B PlanzDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Mariam MoshiriDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBrentwood Hospital · USIsland Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of pregnant patients with cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary team to effectively diagnose, stage, and manage the cancer while also being cognizant of the potential harm that diagnosis and treatment may have on the maternal and fetal well-being. Beyond the complex clinical management of these patients is additional medicolegal consideration. Radiologists play a crucial role in the management of these patients as their knowledge of diagnostic and interventional radiology techniques allows for appropriate and safe imaging for both the mother and fetus. In addition, radiologist are able to educate patient on the different imaging modalities and techniques, thus allowing patients to make informed decisions and maintain autonomy over there care. This article will review safety considerations associated with different imaging modalities, contrast agents, interventional radiology procedures and moderate sedation related to the imaging of pregnant patient with cancer with specific attention paid to the medicolegal aspects.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiology, InterventionalContrast MediaDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansPregnancyContrast MediaCancerInformed consentMedicolegalModerate sedationSafteyTeratogenesis

Identifiers

PMID36538081
OpenAlexW4312019466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.