Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36538067›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2023

Osteoarthritis of the hip: is radiography still needed?

Charbel Mourad, Bruno Vande Berg

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiographic evaluation of the painful adolescent and young adult hip.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Charbel MouradDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Libanais Geitaoui CHU, Beyrouth, 1100, Achrafieh, Lebanon. Charbel.j.mourad@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6600-5678
Bruno Vande BergDepartment of Radiology, Cliniques CHC Montlégia, Boulevard Patience Et Beaujonc 2, 4000, Liège, Belgium.
Centre Hospitalier Chrétien · BELebanese Hospital Geitaoui-University Medical Center · LB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of hip osteoarthritis (OA) is based on clinical arguments, and medical imaging is obtained to confirm the diagnosis and rule out other possible sources of pain. Conventional radiographs are recommended as the first line imaging modality to investigate chronic hip pain. They should be obtained in a rigorous technique that includes an antero-posterior (AP) radiograph of the pelvis. The choice of the appropriate lateral view depends on the clinical indication, Lequesne's false profile being valuable in the assessment of OA. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive to detect joint effusion/synovitis, cartilage, labral, and bone marrow lesions. However, structural joint changes are frequent in asymptomatic population and neither radiographs nor MRI have shown a good correlation with pain and functional impairment. MRI seems to be more suitable than radiographs as a biomarker for clinical trials addressing early OA. The absence of a validated MR biomarker of early OA, together with issues related to machine availability and MRI protocol repeatability, prevent the widespread use of MRI in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeBiomarkersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPelvisRadiographyBiomarkersConventional radiographyHipMRIOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID36538067
PMCPMC10509135
OpenAlexW4312019470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.