ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023
Inter- and Intra-Observer Agreement Between Embryologists for Cytoplasmic String Assessment in Day 5/6 Human Blastocysts.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation of fetal heartbeat outcome after Day 3 or Day 5 single embryo transfer of morphologically selected embryos with an annotation-free deep learning scoring system: Results from a multi-center study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Observational
- The Istanbul consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment†,‡.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Predictive Factors for the Formation of Viable Embryos in Subfertile Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve: A Clinical Prediction Study.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2024Article
- The importance of cytoplasmic strings during early human embryonic development.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate inter- and intra-observer agreement in the assessment of cytoplasmic string (CS) by embryologists on day 5/6 human blastocysts using the EmbryoViewer software. This was a prospective study involving five embryologists working between 2019 and 2020. Inter-observer agreement was calculated using assessments performed on 104 day 5/6 blastocysts regarding the presence, number, and location of CS and CS vesicle activity using timelapse videos. Intra-observer agreement was calculated when the same embryologists repeated the observations after a month's break. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was assessed using Fleiss' kappa coefficient and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). The inter-observer agreement on the presence of CS (kappa: 0.477, 95% CI: 0.301-0.639) and their vesicles (kappa: 0.494, 95% CI: 0.345-0.643) was moderate, while the specific characteristics of CS assessment ranged from fair to moderate (kappa scores between: 0.157 and 0.563). The intra-observer agreement indicated an improvement on the level of agreement (kappa scores between: 0.162 and 0.795) compared to the inter-observer agreement. This study has shown a moderate level of inter- and intra-observer agreement when assessing day 5/6 human blastocysts for the presence of CS and their vesicles. When the specific characteristics of CS assessment occurred (such as the number of CS/vesicles) a slight to moderate level of agreement was seen among the embryologists. Agreement of specific characteristics of CS was not optimal, suggesting the need for further training using specifically designed CS quality assurance programme (QAP) modules, to determine if inter- and intra-observer agreement can be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.