ArticleRadiology2023
Inconsistent Partitioning and Unproductive Feature Associations Yield Idealized Radiomic Models.
Article in Radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Image-based artificial intelligence for the prediction of pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- Temporalis muscle biomarkers from routine brain MRI and risk of dementia in two independent cohorts.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Why Radiomics Rarely Reaches the Clinic: Reproducibility, Validation, and Evidence Gap-A Critical Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Graph neural network modeling of spatial tumor-immune interactions identifies prognostic cellular niches in non‑small cell lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Assessing an Automated Noncontrast CT-based Pipeline for Sacral Tumor Classification Using a Hip Bone Reference Frame.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Spatial-temporal radiogenomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy for breast cancer: a comprehensive review.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Radiomics for differential diagnosis of ischemic and dilated cardiomyopathy using non-contrast-enhanced cine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
- Radiomics-Based Prediction of Patient Demographic Characteristics on Chest Radiographs: Looking Beyond Deep Learning for Risk of Bias.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2025Article
- A review of deep learning for brain tumor analysis in MRI.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Review
- Assessing generalizability of an AI-based visual test for cervical cancer screening.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- MRI radiomics for hamstring strain injury identification and return to sport classification: a pilot study.Skeletal radiology · 2024Article
- METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-based image analysis in clinical testing: lessons from cervical cancer screening.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven radiomics: developing valuable radiomics signatures with the use of artificial intelligence.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Machine Learning Combined with Radiomics Facilitating the Personal Treatment of Malignant Liver Tumors.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Predictive IDH Genotyping Based on the Evaluation of Spatial Metabolic Heterogeneity by Compartmental Uptake Characteristics in Preoperative Glioma UsingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Data Partitioning and Statistical Considerations for Association of Radiomic Features to Biological Underpinnings: What Is Needed.Radiology · 2023Article
- MRI radiomics and potential applications to glioblastoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background Radiomics is the extraction of predefined mathematic features from medical images for the prediction of variables of clinical interest. While some studies report superlative accuracy of radiomic machine learning (ML) models, the published methodology is often incomplete, and the results are rarely validated in external testing data sets. Purpose To characterize the type, prevalence, and statistical impact of methodologic errors present in radiomic ML studies. Materials and Methods Radiomic ML publications were reviewed for the presence of performance-inflating methodologic flaws. Common flaws were subsequently reproduced with randomly generated features interpolated from publicly available radiomic data sets to demonstrate the precarious nature of reported findings. Results In an assessment of radiomic ML publications, the authors uncovered two general categories of data analysis errors: inconsistent partitioning and unproductive feature associations. In simulations, the authors demonstrated that inconsistent partitioning augments radiomic ML accuracy by 1.4 times from unbiased performance and that correcting for flawed methodologic results in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve approaching a value of 0.5 (random chance). With use of randomly generated features, the authors illustrated that unproductive associations between radiomic features and gene sets can imply false causality for biologic phenomenon. Conclusion Radiomic machine learning studies may contain methodologic flaws that undermine their validity. This study provides a review template to avoid such flaws. © RSNA, 2022
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.