Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36537809›Full record

ArticlemBio2023

A Natural Fungal Gene Drive Enacts Killing via DNA Disruption.

Andrew S Urquhart, Donald M Gardiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional constraints ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. A meiotic driver hijacks an epigenetic reader to disrupt mitosis in noncarrier offspring.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Proliferation and dissemination of killer meiotic drive loci.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew S UrquhartCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6687-9965
Donald M GardinerCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2162-8716
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal spore killers are a class of selfish genetic elements that positively bias their own inheritance by killing non-inheriting gametes following meiosis. As killing takes place specifically within the developing fungal ascus, a tissue which is experimentally difficult to isolate, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying spore killers are limited. In particular, how these loci kill other spores within the fungal ascus is largely unknown. Here, we overcome these experimental barriers by developing model systems in 2 evolutionary distant organisms, Escherichia coli (bacterium) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast), similar to previous approaches taken to examine the

Indexed as

Atypical Squamous Cells of the CervixGene Drive TechnologyDNAFemaleGenes, FungalHumansMeiosisSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpores, FungalDNADNAfilamentous fungifungigene drivesmechanismnucleasesspore killer

Identifiers

PMID36537809
PMCPMC9972908
OpenAlexW4312019060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.