Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36537446›Full record

SynthesisNoise & health

Impact of Noise Exposure on Risk of Developing Stress-Related Metabolic Effects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Kapeena Sivakumaran, Jennifer A Ritonja, Haya Waseem, Leena AlShenaiber, Elissa Morgan, Salman A Ahmadi, Allison Denning, David Michaud, Rebecca L Morgan

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Noise & health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kapeena SivakumaranDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, Canada.
Jennifer A RitonjaUniversity of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Haya WaseemDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, Canada.
Leena AlShenaiberDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, Canada.
Elissa MorganDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, Canada.
Salman A AhmadiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Allison DenningHealth Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David MichaudHealth Canada, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Consumer and Clinical Radiation Protection Bureau, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Rebecca L MorganDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; Evidence Foundation, Cleveland Heights, Ohio, USA, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Exposure to noise can increase biological stress reactions, which may increase adverse health effects, including metabolic disorders; however, the certainty in the association between exposure to noise and metabolic outcomes has not been widely explored. The objective of this review is to evaluate the evidence between noise exposures and metabolic effects. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of English and comparative studies available in PubMed, Cochrane Central, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases between January 1, 1980 and December 29, 2021 was performed. Risk of Bias of Nonrandomized Studies of Exposures was used to assess risk of bias of individual studies and certainty of the body of evidence for each outcome was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: Fifty-six primary studies reporting on cortisol, cholesterol levels, waist circumference, glucose levels, and adrenaline and/or noradrenaline were identified. Although meta-analyses suggested that there may be an increase in waist circumference and adrenaline with increased noise exposure, the certainty in the evidence is very low. Overall, the certainty in the evidence of an effect of increased noise on all the outcomes were low to very low due to concerns with risk of bias, inconsistency across exposure sources, populations, and studies, and imprecision in the estimates of effects. Conclusions: The certainty of the evidence of increased noise on metabolic effects was low to very low, which likely reflects the inability to compare across the totality of the evidence for each outcome. The findings from this review may be used to inform policies involving noise reduction and mitigation strategies, and to direct further research in areas that currently have limited evidence available.

Indexed as

EpinephrineBiasEpinephrineEnvironmental noiseGRADEmetabolicsoundstress

Identifiers

PMID36537446
PMCPMC10088431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.