Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36537299›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2023

Exploring the relationship between job characteristics and infection: Application of a COVID-19 job exposure matrix to SARS-CoV-2 infection data in the United Kingdom.

Sarah Rhodes, Sarah Beale, Jack Wilkinson, Karin van Veldhoven, Ioannis Basinas, William Mueller, Karen M Oude Hengel, Alex Burdorf, Susan Peters, Zara A Stokholm and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Sarah RhodesDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. sarah.a.rhodes@manchester.ac.uk.
Sarah Beale
Jack Wilkinson
Karin van Veldhoven
Ioannis Basinas
William Mueller
Karen M Oude Hengel
Alex Burdorf
Susan Peters
Zara A Stokholm
Vivi Schlünssen
Henrik Kolstad
Anjoeka Pronk
Neil Pearce
Andrew Hayward
Martie van Tongeren
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity College London · GBUtrecht University · NLAarhus University · DKDanish Ramazzini Center · DKErasmus MC · NLInstitute of Occupational Medicine · GBNetherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_ PC 19070Medical Research Council MC_PC_19070Medical Research Council MR/V028375/1Wellcome Trust 206602/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether workplace exposures as estimated via a COVID-19 job exposure matrix (JEM) are associated with SARS-CoV-2 in the UK.

methodsData on 244 470 participants were available from the Office for National Statistics Coronavirus Infection Survey (CIS) and 16 801 participants from the Virus Watch Cohort, restricted to workers aged 20-64 years. Analysis used logistic regression models with SARS-CoV-2 as the dependent variable for eight individual JEM domains (number of workers, nature of contacts, contact via surfaces, indoor or outdoor location, ability to social distance, use of face covering, job insecurity, and migrant workers) with adjustment for age, sex, ethnicity, index of multiple deprivation (IMD), region, household size, urban versus rural area, and health conditions. Analyses were repeated for three time periods (i) February 2020 (Virus Watch)/April 2020 (CIS) to May 2021), (ii) June 2021 to November 2021, and (iii) December 2021 to January 2022.

resultsOverall, higher risk classifications for the first six domains tended to be associated with an increased risk of infection, with little evidence of a relationship for domains relating to proportion of workers with job insecurity or migrant workers. By time there was a clear exposure-response relationship for these domains in the first period only. Results were largely consistent across the two UK cohorts.

conclusionsAn exposure-response relationship exists in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic for number of contacts, nature of contacts, contacts via surfaces, indoor or outdoor location, ability to social distance and use of face coverings. These associations appear to have diminished over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2United Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID36537299
PMCPMC10621898
OpenAlexW4312018779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.