ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
A patient- and acquisition-tailored injection approach for improving consistency of CT enhancement towards a target CT value in coronary CT angiography.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiation and Contrast Medium Dosage Optimization of Coronary CT Angiography While Combining Personalized Patient Protocol Technology and Automated Tube Voltage Selection Technology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A personalized iodine delivery rate-based injection protocol in coronary angiography on photon-counting CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Validation of a multi-parameter algorithm for personalized contrast injection protocol in liver CT.European radiology experimental · 2024Article
- A patient- and acquisition-tailored injection approach for improving consistency of CT enhancement towards a target CT value in coronary CT angiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnoptimized coronary CT angiography (CTA) exams typically result in a highly variable arterial enhancement (HU
methodsFirst, the optimal body size metric to predict HU
resultsFat free mass (FFM) showed the highest correlation with HU
conclusionA contrast injection model, based on patient's fat free mass and accounting for the contrast agent concentration and the planned CT-scan tube voltage, harmonized arterial enhancement among patients towards a predefined target enhancement in coronary CTA scanning, without affecting the bolus timing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.