ArticleHeliyon2022
Can ultrasonographic measurement of respiratory variability in the diameter of the internal jugular vein and the subclavian vein predict fluid responsiveness in parturients during cesarean delivery? A prospective cohort study.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07041021 (Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management Guided by Respiratory Variations of Internal Jugular Vein on Postoperative Complications in Abdominal Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Intraoperative Fluid Management Guided by Respiratory Variations of Internal Jugular Vein on Postoperative Complications in Abdominal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory variation in the internal jugular vein does not predict fluid responsiveness in the prone position during adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a prospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Trial
- Changes in internal jugular vein respiratory variation during tidal volume challenge predict volume responsiveness in lumbar surgery under protective ventilation: a prospective cohort study.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Internal jugular distensibility index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in adult patients undergoing elective surgery - A prospective accuracy study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hemodynamic stability: a prospective repeated-measures study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advances in the application of ultrasonographic parameters for fluid management in obstetric anesthesia.American journal of translational research · 2024Review
- Internal jugular vein collapsibility does not predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients after cardiac surgery.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasonic measurements of the respiratory variability in the diameter of internal jugular vein (IJV-CI) and subclavian vein (SCV-CI) have recently been reported to be useful in predicting fluid responses in non-obstetric patients with spontaneous respiration. This study evaluated whether IJV-CI and SCV-CI could reliably predict fluid responsiveness in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Objective: This study was conducted to determine whether two indicators measured by ultrasound are good predictors of fluid responsiveness of parturients with spontaneous respiration in elective cesarean delivery. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: A single-center tertiary specialty hospital in China. Patients: A total of 86 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section were included and 6 were excluded for various reasons. Interventions: Based on the results of the fluid challenge, the included parturients were divided into two groups, with those who responded to fluid challenge defined as the positive group and those who did not respond defined as the negative group. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was to determine the predictive value of IJV-CI and SCV-CI for fluid responsiveness (≥15% increases in SVI after fluid challenge) in spontaneous respiration patients. Results: Forty-three (53.8%) parturients were fluid responders. IJV-CI and SCV-CI proved to be the independent predictors for fluid responsiveness by multivariate logistic regression. The area under the ROC curve for IJV-CI and SCV-CI were 0.881 (95% CI, 0.808-0.953, p < 0.0005) and 0.757 (95% CI, 0.648-0.865, p < 0.0008), respectively. Their optimal cut-off values for IJV-CI and SCV-CI were 20.7% (sensitivity of 60%; specificity of 79%) and 32.0% (sensitivity of 34%; specificity of 96%), respectively. The grey zone for IJV-CI and SCV-CI for fluid responsiveness were 20.4-32.4% and 30.4-44.6% and included 25% and 23% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasonic-derived IJV-CI is better than SCV-CI in predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing parturients. Both IJV-CI and SCV-CI are the accurate and readily accessible indices of fluid responsiveness in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Trial registration: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028450).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.