Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536823›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Model for Predicting Distant Metastasis of Solid Lung Adenocarcinoma: 3D Radiomics, 2D Radiomics and Clinical Features.

Zhiwei Peng, Ze Lin, Anjing He, Li Yi, Mengni Jin, Zhiyong Chen, Yahong Tao, Yuhua Yang, Can Cui, Ying Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lack of incremental value of three-dimensional measurement in assessing invasiveness for lung cancer.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhiwei Peng *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Ze Lin *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Anjing He *Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Li YiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Mengni JinDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyong ChenDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Yahong TaoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Yuhua YangDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Can CuiDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Ying LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.
Minjing ZuoDepartment of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-0479-7080
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate models for predicting distant metastases in patients with solid lung adenocarcinomas using 3D radiomic features, 2D radiomic features, clinical features, and their combinations. Methods: This retrospective study included 253 eligible patients with solid adenocarcinoma of the lung diagnosed at our hospital between August 2018 and August 2021. 3D and 2D regions of interest were segmented from computed tomography-enhanced thin-slice images of the venous phase, and 851 radiomic features were extracted in each region. The Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm was used to select radiomic features and calculate radiomic scores, and logistic regression was used to develop the model. Development of a 3D radiomics model (model 1), a 2D radiomics model (model 2), a combined 3D radiomics and 2D radiomics model (model 3), a clinical model (model 4), and a comprehensive model (model 5) for the prediction of distant metastases in patients with solid lung adenocarcinomas. Nomograms were drawn to illustrate model 5, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used for model evaluation. Results: The AUC (area under the curve) of model 1, model 2, model 3, model 4, and model 5 in the test set was 0.711, 0.769, 0.775, 0.829, and 0.892, respectively. The Delong test showed that AUC values were statistically different between model 5 and model 1 (p=0.001), and there was no statistical difference in AUC between the other models. Based on a comprehensive review of DCA, ROC curve, and Akaike information criterion (AIC), Model 5 is demonstrated to have better clinical utility, goodness of fit, and parsimony. Conclusion: A comprehensive model based on 3D radiomic features, 2D radiomic features, and clinical features has the potential to predict distant metastasis in patients with solid lung adenocarcinomas.

Indexed as

adenocarcinoma of lungcomputed tomographydistant metastasislung neoplasmsradiomics

Identifiers

PMID36536823
PMCPMC9758990
OpenAlexW4311175806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.