Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536800›Full record

ArticleJournal of academic librarianship2021

Love Data Week in the time of COVID-19: A content analysis of Love Data Week 2021 events.

Alisa B Rod, Marcela Y Isuster, Martin Chandler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of academic librarianship, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alisa B RodMcGill University Library, 550 Sherbrooke Street West, West Tower, 6th floor, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B9, Canada.
Marcela Y IsusterMcGill University Library, 3459 McTavish Street, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0C9, Canada.
Martin ChandlerCape Breton University Library, 1250 Grand Lake Road, Sydney, Nova Scotia B1M 1A2.
McGill University · CACape Breton University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A primary role for data-focused librarians is building community through traditional and novel modes of in-person outreach, including consultations, training, and themed events such as Love Data Week. Unfortunately, the COVID-19 pandemic rendered in-person events impossible. However, Love Data Week 2021 persisted in an online format, allowing data-focused librarians a unique chance to initiate outreach to geographically dispersed constituents. In this study, the authors investigate the nature and context of Love Data Week 2021 events to gain insight into current research data services trends, as impacted by the global COVID-19 pandemic. The authors collected qualitative information about 242 Love Data Week 2021 events across 37 organizations and coded the information using manual content analysis. This paper reports on descriptive results from the content analysis, including the dominant topics across events (software or digital tools, research data management, and service or product awareness) and the primary mode of events (workshops). The authors discuss implications for future research on Love Data Week and themed weeks in general as successful modes of outreach, community-building, and as venues for tracking emerging trends in the context of research data services.

Indexed as

Data librarianshipLove data weekResearch dataResearch data services

Identifiers

PMID36536800
PMCPMC9752048
OpenAlexW3199898089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.