Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536769›Full record

ArticleInternational review of financial analysis2022

Gold or Bitcoin, which is the safe haven during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Fenghua Wen, Xi Tong, Xiaohang Ren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International review of financial analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. COVID-19 and finance scholarship: A systematic and bibliometric analysis.International review of financial analysis · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. In search of hedges and safe havens during the COVID-19 pandemic: Gold versus Bitcoin, oil, and oil uncertainty.The Quarterly review of economics and finance : journal of the Midwest Economics Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fenghua WenSchool of Business, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China.
Xi TongSchool of Business, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China.
Xiaohang RenSchool of Business, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compares the dynamic spillover effects of gold and Bitcoin prices on the oil and stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic via time-varying parameter vector autoregression. Both time-varying and time-point results indicate that gold is a safe haven for oil and stock markets during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, unlike gold, Bitcoin's response is the opposite, rejecting the safe haven property. Further analysis shows that the safe-haven effects of gold on the stock market become stronger when the pandemic critically spreads.

Indexed as

BitcoinCOVID-19GoldImpulse responseSafe havenTVP-VAR model

Identifiers

PMID36536769
PMCPMC8964013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.