Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536734›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

The impact of gastric pouch size, based on the number of staplers, on the short-term weight outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Neda Haghighat, Hooman Kamran, Mohammad Naser Moaddeli, Babak Hosseini, Ali Karimi, Iman Hesameddini, Masoud Amini, Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Abtin Vahidi, Nader Moeinvaziri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Neda HaghighatLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hooman KamranLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad Naser MoaddeliLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Babak HosseiniLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali KarimiLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Iman HesameddiniLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Masoud AminiLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Vahid HosseiniLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Abtin VahidiLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Nader MoeinvaziriLaparoscopy Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: No standard of anatomical variables, including stoma size, limb length, pouch size, and volume, has been determined for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass yet. Herein, we evaluated the effect of two different techniques for creating the gastric pouch on short-term postoperative weight loss. Methods: This retrospective cohort was conducted on patients with a laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass history from January 2019 to September 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: in one group, patients' gastric pouch was made using two 60 mm linear staplers, while in the other group, the gastric pouch was made using three 60 mm linear staplers. Anthropometric data, including weight, height, and body mass index (BMI), were measured preoperatively and six months following surgery. Weight outcomes, such as weight loss, a decrease in BMI, excess weight loss (%EWL), and total weight loss (%TWL), were calculated as short-term weight outcomes. Results: Two groups, each containing 50 patients, were included. Patients with smaller pouches (two staplers) had 32.4 ± 9.2 kg weight loss, and those with larger pouches (three staplers) had a 31.42 ± 10.3 kg weight loss. Also, %EWL was 69.7 ± 14.9 and 63.0 ± 20.9, and %TWL was 28.2 ± 6.0 and 26.14 ± 7.5 in patients with two stapler pouches and three stapler pouches, respectively. None of the weight outcome parameters were significantly different between the groups (p-value>0.05). Conclusion: Various studies have been conducted, resulting in different conclusions regarding the effect of the size of the gastric pouch on weight loss. One of the major differences contributing to varying literature studies results is the measurement method used for gastric pouch size. We conclude that using two staplers is not a way to achieve a better result. As the best measurement method has not been defined, studies comparing different methods are suggested; here, the aim was to use a more simple and clinical method regarding this issue.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryGastric bypassPouchSurgical staplersWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID36536734
PMCPMC9758377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.