Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536733›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022

A retrospective cohort study on the use of machine learning to predict stone-free status following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An experience from Saudi Arabia.

Mohammad A Alghafees, Saleha Abdul Rab, Abdulaziz S Aljurayyad, Tariq S Alotaibi, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Raouf M Seyam, Lama H Aldosari, Mohammad A Alomar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad A AlghafeesCollege of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleha Abdul RabCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz S AljurayyadDepartment of Urology, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq S AlotaibiDepartment of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Belal Nedal SabbahCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raouf M SeyamDepartment of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lama H AldosariDepartment of Urology, King Fahad University Hospital, Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad A AlomarDepartment of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Machine learning techniques have been used extensively in the field of clinical medicine, especially when used for the construction of prediction models. The aim of the study was to use machine learning to predict the stone-free status after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of 137 patients. Data from adult patients who underwent PCNL at our institute were used for the purpose of this study. Three supervised machine learning algorithms were employed: Logistic Regression, XGBoost Regressor, and Random Forests. A set of variables comprising independent attributes including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus, gout, renal and stone factors (previous surgery, stone location, size, and staghorn status), and pre-operative surgical factors (infections, stent, hemoglobin, creatinine, and bacteriuria) were entered. Results: 137 patients were identified. The majority were males (65.4%; n = 89), aged 50 years and above (41.9%; n = 57). The stone-free status (SFS) rate was 86% (n = 118). An inverse relation was detected between SFS, and CKD and HTN. The accuracies were 71.4%, 74.5% and 75% using Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and Random Forest algorithms, respectively. Stone size, pre-operative hemoglobin, pre-operative creatinine, and stone type were the most important factors in predicting the SFS following PCNL. Conclusion: The Random Forest model showed the highest efficacy in predicting SFS. We developed an effective machine learning model to assist physicians and other healthcare professionals in selecting patients with renal stones who are most likely to have successful PCNL treatment based on their demographics and stone characteristics. Larger multicenter studies are needed to develop more powerful algorithms, such as deep learning and other AI subsets.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningPercutaneous nephrolithotomyRenal stoneStone-free status predictionUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID36536733
PMCPMC9758327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.