ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2022
Assessment of the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of Filipino obstetrics and gynecology residents on fertility preservation: A cross-sectional study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As primary reproductive healthcare providers, residents-in-training must be equipped with the knowledge of proven and available methods for fertility preservation. The study evaluated Filipino obstetrics and gynecology residents' current knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions about fertility preservation. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among obstetrics and gynecology residents in the Philippines. A 24-item questionnaire was distributed to the different accredited training institutions of the Philippine Obstetrical and Gynecological Society by electronic mail. Univariate descriptive statistics were reported as mean for continuous variables and frequency with percentage for categorical variables. The chi-square test was used to determine differences in responses. Results: A total of 143 respondents from different year levels of training were enrolled in the study. Most were female trainees (88.11%) from the National Capital Region (44.76%). Most respondents agreed that discussions about childbearing intentions (99.30%) and age-related fertility decline (98.60%) should be initiated during a patient's gynecological consult. Residents were most familiar with oocyte freezing (84.62%), fertility-sparing surgeries (83.22%), and the use of GnRH agonists (80.42%) as fertility preservation techniques. Despite being most familiar with oocyte freezing, the respondents have mainly referred patients for fertility-sparing surgeries (48.95%) and the use of GnRH agonists (48.25%). Conclusions: There was an overall reassuring perception and attitude of obstetrics and gynecology residents on fertility preservation. A standardized curriculum with teaching-learning activities on fertility preservation may be used to improve trainees' knowledge. There was a disparity in the knowledge and actual referral or utilization of the different methods, reflecting the inaccessibility of the procedures specific to their institutions. This highlights the need to improve accessibility and offer fertility preservation as a public health service.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.