Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536528›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Ten-year outcomes of whole-pelvic intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer with regional lymph node metastasis.

Kiyonao Nakamura, Yoshiki Norihisa, Itaru Ikeda, Haruo Inokuchi, Rihito Aizawa, Toshiyuki Kamoto, Tomomi Kamba, Takahiro Inoue, Toshinari Yamasaki, Shusuke Akamatsu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kiyonao NakamuraDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8660-4363
Yoshiki NorihisaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Itaru IkedaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Haruo InokuchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Rihito AizawaDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiyuki KamotoDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomomi KambaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takahiro InoueDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshinari YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Shusuke AkamatsuDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1069-2816
Osamu OgawaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takashi MizowakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Image-Applied Therapy, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8135-8746
Kyoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of pelvic node-positive prostate cancer has been challenging and controversial. We conducted a study to evaluate the outcomes of whole-pelvic (WP) simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

methodsA total of 67 consecutive patients with cT1c-4N1M0 prostate cancer were definitively treated by WP SIB-IMRT. Neoadjuvant ADT (median: 8.3 months) was administered in all cases. WP SIB-IMRT was designed to simultaneously deliver 78, 66.3, and 58.5 Gy in 39 fractions to the prostate plus seminal vesicles, metastatic lymph nodes (LNs), and the pelvic LN region, respectively. Adjuvant ADT (median: 24.7 months) was administered in 66 patients.

resultsThe median follow-up period was 81.6 months (range: 30.5-160.7). Biochemical relapse-free, overall, and prostate cancer-specific survival rates at 10 years were 59.8%, 79.6%, and 86.3%, respectively. Loco-regional recurrence was not observed. Being in International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 5 and having a posttreatment detectable nadir prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (≥0.010 ng/ml) were significantly associated with worse prostate cancer-specific survival and progression of castration resistance. The 10-year cumulative incidence rates of grade 2 and 3 late toxicities were, respectively, 1.5% and 0% for genitourinary, 0% and 1.5% for gastrointestinal events. No grade 4 acute or late toxicities were observed.

conclusionsWP SIB-IMRT can be safely administered to patients with pelvic node-positive prostate cancer. Since grade group 5 and detectable nadir PSA levels are risks for castration resistance, we may need to increase the intensity of treatment for such cases.

Indexed as

Pelvic NeoplasmsProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAndrogen AntagonistsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstate-Specific AntigenAndrogen AntagonistsProstate-Specific Antigenlymphatic metastasisprostate-specific antigenprostatic neoplasmsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36536528
PMCPMC10134326
OpenAlexW4312019600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.