Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536521›Full record

ReviewAging cell2023

Cellular expansion of MSCs: Shifting the regenerative potential.

Katherine Miclau, William S Hambright, Johnny Huard, Martin J Stoddart, Chelsea S Bahney

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Aging cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. PET/EVOH nonwoven fabrics supportRegenerative therapy · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. What's New in Musculoskeletal Basic Science.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katherine MiclauCenter for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine (CRPM), Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5618-799X
William S HambrightCenter for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine (CRPM), Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Johnny HuardCenter for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine (CRPM), Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Martin J StoddartOrthopaedic Trauma Institute (OTI), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Chelsea S BahneyCenter for Regenerative and Personalized Medicine (CRPM), Steadman Philippon Research Institute, Vail, Colorado, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USAO Foundation · CH

Funding

Therapeutic Application of Painless Nerve Growth Factor to Accelerate Endochondral Fracture RepairR01AR077761 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BAHNEY, CHELSEA SHIELDS · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR077761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mesenchymal-derived stromal or progenitor cells, commonly called "MSCs," have attracted significant clinical interest for their remarkable abilities to promote tissue regeneration and reduce inflammation. Recent studies have shown that MSCs' therapeutic effects, originally attributed to the cells' direct differentiation capacity into the tissue of interest, are largely driven by the biomolecules the cells secrete, including cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, and extracellular vesicles containing miRNA. This secretome coordinates upregulation of endogenous repair and immunomodulation in the local microenvironment through crosstalk of MSCs with host tissue cells. Therapeutic applications for MSCs and their secretome-derived products often involve in vitro monolayer expansion. However, consecutive passaging of MSCs significantly alters their therapeutic potential, inducing a broad shift from a pro-regenerative to a pro-inflammatory phenotype. A consistent by-product of in vitro expansion of MSCs is the onset of replicative senescence, a state of cell arrest characterized by an increased release of proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors. However, little is known about changes in the secretome profile at different stages of in vitro expansion. Some culture conditions and bioprocessing techniques have shown promise in more effectively retaining the pro-regenerative and anti-inflammatory MSC phenotype throughout expansion. Understanding how in vitro expansion conditions influence the nature and function of MSCs, and their associated secretome, may provide key insights into the underlying mechanisms driving these alterations. Elucidating the dynamic and diverse changes in the MSC secretome at each stage of in vitro expansion is a critical next step in the development of standardized, safe, and effective MSC-based therapies.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsMicroRNAsCell DifferentiationCytokinesCytokinesMicroRNAscellular senescencein vitro expansionmesenchymal stromal cellMSCpassagingregenerationsecretome

Identifiers

PMID36536521
PMCPMC9835588
OpenAlexW4311948619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.