Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536501›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2023

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus immediate surgery for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Christina Intrator, Karim Hassan, Mantej Sehmbhi, Jigar Shah, Eshan Mazumdar, Ambareen Kausar, Thomas Satyadas

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Prognosis of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Shahab HajibandehDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3294-4335
Shahin HajibandehHepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver transplant Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-1068
Christina IntratorDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-8282
Karim HassanDepartment of General Surgery, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Wrexham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2413-1297
Mantej SehmbhiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside and West Hospitals, New York, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1091-5808
Jigar ShahDepartment of General Surgery, North Manchester General Hospital, North Manchester Care Organisation, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6170-4605
Eshan MazumdarDepartment of General Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0266-5922
Ambareen KausarDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0234-9321
Thomas SatyadasDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-670X
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBManchester Royal Infirmary · GBBetsi Cadwaladr University Health Board · GBMount Sinai Hospital · USNorth Manchester General Hospital · GBRoyal Blackburn Teaching Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to compare resection and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and immediate surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer (RPC) or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards, a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. Random effects modeling was applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Likelihood of type 1 or 2 errors in the meta-analysis model was assessed by trial sequential analysis. A total of 400 patients from four RCTs were included. When RPC and BRPC were analyzed together, neoadjuvant CRT resulted in a higher R0 resection rate (risk ratio [RR]: 1.55,

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant therapyPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID36536501
PMCPMC9947376
OpenAlexW4311949605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.