Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536329›Full record

Observational studyBMC urology2022

Renal cell carcinoma: the population, real world, and cost-of-illness.

Alessandra Buja, Giuseppe De Luca, Maura Gatti, Claudia Cozzolino, Massimo Rugge, Manuel Zorzi, Mario Gardi, Matteo Sepulcri, Davide Bimbatti, Vincenzo Baldo and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alessandra BujaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan, 18, 35131, Padua, Italy. alessandra.buja@unipd.it.
Giuseppe De LucaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan, 18, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Maura GattiStatistics Department, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Claudia CozzolinoSoft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Massimo RuggeDepartment of Medicine - DIMED, Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Manuel ZorziVeneto Tumor Registry, Azienda Zero, Padua, Italy.
Mario GardiUnit of Urology, Ospedale Sant'Antonio, Azienda Ospedale Università-Padova, Padua, Italy.
Matteo SepulcriRadiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Davide BimbattiOncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Vincenzo BaldoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences, and Public Health, University of Padua, Via Loredan, 18, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Marco MaruzzoOncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Umberto BassoOncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Vittorina ZagonelOncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RCC treatment landscape has evolved dramatically over the past decade. The purpose of this study is to present a real-world data estimation of RCC's cost-of-illness for this tumour's clinical pathway.

methodsThis investigation is a population-based cohort study using real-world data, which considers all RCC incident cases diagnosed in Local Unit 6 of the Province of Padua in 2016 and 2017 as registered by the Veneto Cancer Registry. Data on drug prescriptions, the use of medical devices, hospital admissions, and visits to outpatient clinics and emergency departments were collected by means of administrative databases. We evaluated the costs of all healthcare procedures performed in the 2 years of follow-up post-RCC diagnosis. The overall and annual average real-world costs per patient, both as a whole and by single item, were calculated and stratified by stage of disease at diagnosis.

resultsThe analysis involved a population of 148 patients with a median age of 65.8 years, 66.22% of whom were male. Two years after diagnosis, the average total costs amounted to €21,429 per patient. There is a steady increment in costs with increasing stage at diagnosis, with a total amount of €41,494 spent 2 years after diagnosis for stage IV patients, which is 2.44 times higher than the expenditure for stage I patients (€17,037). In the first year, hospitalization appeared to be the most expensive item for both early and advanced disease. In the second year, however, outpatient procedures were the main cost driver in the earlier stages, whereas anticancer drugs accounted for the highest costs in the advanced stages.

conclusionsThis observational study provides real-world and valuable estimates of RCC's cost-of-illness, which could enable policymakers to construct dynamic economic cost-effectiveness evaluation models based on real world costs' evaluation.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsCost-of-illnessEconomic impactReal-world dataRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID36536329
PMCPMC9764745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.