Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536323›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Xerostomia, the perception of general and oral health and health risk behaviours in people over 65 years of age.

Alba Pérez-Jardón, Mario Pérez-Sayáns, Manuel Peñamaría-Mallón, Eva Otero-Rey, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, José López-López, José María Martínez-González, Andrés Blanco-Carrión

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alba Pérez-JardónOral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes). Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705, A Coruña, Spain.
Mario Pérez-SayánsOral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes). Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705, A Coruña, Spain. mario.perez@usc.es.
Manuel Peñamaría-MallónOral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes). Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705, A Coruña, Spain.
Eva Otero-ReyOral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes). Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705, A Coruña, Spain.
Eugenio Velasco-OrtegaDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, C/Avicena s/n, 41009, Seville, Spain.
José López-LópezOral Health and Masticatory System Group-IDIBELL, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Odontological Hospital University of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, 08907, Barcelona, Spain.
José María Martínez-GonzálezDepartment of dental Clinical Specialties, Faculty of dentistry, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Andrés Blanco-CarriónOral Medicine, Oral Surgery and Implantology Unit (MedOralRes). Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15705, A Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study investigated the association between xerostomia and health risk behaviours, general and oral health and quality of life.

methodsA cross-sectional study involving 800 adults over 65 years of age residing in Spain using a computer-assisted telephone questionnaire. The severity of xerostomia was assessed through the Xerostomia Inventory (XI). Both univariate and adjusted multinomial logistic regression were used to determine the risk (OR) of xerostomia.

resultsThe sample comprised of 492 females (61.5%) and 308 males, with a mean age of 73.7 ± 5.8 years. Some, 30.7% had xerostomia: 25.6% mild, 4.8% moderate and 0.3% severe, the majority being female (34.8% vs 24%; p = 0.003). The mean XI was 24.6 ± 6.3 (95% CI 19.2-24.8) for those with poor health, whereas it was 17.4 ± 6.3 (95%CI 16.1-18.6) in those reporting very good health (p < 0.001). This difference was also observed in terms of oral health, with the XI mean recorded as 14.7 ± 10.7 for very poor oral health and 6.4 ± 5.4 for those with very good health (p = 0.002). Logistic regression showed that the highest OR for xerostomia was observed among adults with poor general health (2.81; 95%CI 1.8-4.3; p < 0.001) and for adjusted model the OR was still significant (2.18; 95%CI 1.4-3.4; p = 0.001). Those who needed help with household chores had 2.16 higher OR (95%CI 1.4-3.4; p = 0.001) and 1.69 (95%CI 1.1-2.7; p = 0.03) in the adjusted model. Females had a higher risk of suffering from xerostomia than males.

conclusionThe strong association between xerostomia and the general and oral health status of older adults justifies the need for early assessment and regular follow-up.

Indexed as

Oral HealthXerostomiaAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Risk BehaviorsHumansMalePerceptionQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesHealthLifestyleOral healthQuality of lifeXerostomia

Identifiers

PMID36536323
PMCPMC9764469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.