ArticleBMC geriatrics2022
Xerostomia, the perception of general and oral health and health risk behaviours in people over 65 years of age.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and in vitro evaluation of a xylitol/erythritol carbomer gel for xerostomia relief.Odontology · 2026Article
- Compressed Medicated Chewing Gum with Lysozyme Hydrochloride and Ascorbic Acid for Xerostomia Relief and Oral Health Support: Formulation Development, Optimization,Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Impact of polypharmacy on oral health in the elderly: challenges and management.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
- Association between oral dryness and dysphagia in community-dwelling older population.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2025Article
- Prediction of xerostomia in elderly based on clinical characteristics and salivary flow rate with machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hyposalivation but not Sjögren's syndrome associated with microbial dysbiosis in women.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Prevalence and association of oral manifestations with disease severity in patients diagnosed with COVID‑19: A cross‑sectional study.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study investigated the association between xerostomia and health risk behaviours, general and oral health and quality of life.
methodsA cross-sectional study involving 800 adults over 65 years of age residing in Spain using a computer-assisted telephone questionnaire. The severity of xerostomia was assessed through the Xerostomia Inventory (XI). Both univariate and adjusted multinomial logistic regression were used to determine the risk (OR) of xerostomia.
resultsThe sample comprised of 492 females (61.5%) and 308 males, with a mean age of 73.7 ± 5.8 years. Some, 30.7% had xerostomia: 25.6% mild, 4.8% moderate and 0.3% severe, the majority being female (34.8% vs 24%; p = 0.003). The mean XI was 24.6 ± 6.3 (95% CI 19.2-24.8) for those with poor health, whereas it was 17.4 ± 6.3 (95%CI 16.1-18.6) in those reporting very good health (p < 0.001). This difference was also observed in terms of oral health, with the XI mean recorded as 14.7 ± 10.7 for very poor oral health and 6.4 ± 5.4 for those with very good health (p = 0.002). Logistic regression showed that the highest OR for xerostomia was observed among adults with poor general health (2.81; 95%CI 1.8-4.3; p < 0.001) and for adjusted model the OR was still significant (2.18; 95%CI 1.4-3.4; p = 0.001). Those who needed help with household chores had 2.16 higher OR (95%CI 1.4-3.4; p = 0.001) and 1.69 (95%CI 1.1-2.7; p = 0.03) in the adjusted model. Females had a higher risk of suffering from xerostomia than males.
conclusionThe strong association between xerostomia and the general and oral health status of older adults justifies the need for early assessment and regular follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.