Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536322›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Magnetic resonance imaging in late pregnancy to improve labour and delivery outcomes - a systematic literature review.

Shireen Jaufuraully, Brian Dromey, Lisa Story, Anna L David, George Attilakos, Dimitrios Siassakos

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shireen JaufuraullyElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK. s.jaufuraully@nhs.net.
Brian DromeyElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Lisa StoryDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Anna L DavidElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
George AttilakosElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
Dimitrios SiassakosElizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK.
National Institute for Health Research · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBWellcome / EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203145/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue visualisation which may be useful in late pregnancy to predict labour outcome and maternal/neonatal birth trauma.

objectiveTo study if MRI in late pregnancy can predict maternal and neonatal outcomes of labour and birth.

methodsSystematic review of studies that performed MRI in late pregnancy or immediately postpartum. Studies were included if they imaged maternal pelvic or neonatal structures and assessed birth outcome. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the heterogeneity of studies.

resultsEighteen studies were selected. Twelve studies explored the value of MRI pelvimetry measurement and its utility to predict cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD) and vaginal breech birth. Four explored cervical imaging in predicting time interval to birth. Two imaged women in active labour and assessed mouldability of the fetal skull. No marker of CPD had both high sensitivity and specificity for predicting labour outcome. The fetal pelvic index yielded sensitivities between 59 and 60%, and specificities between 34 to 64%. Similarly, although the sensitivity of the cephalopelvic disproportion index in predicting labour outcome was high (85%), specificity was only 56%. In women with breech presentation, MRI was demonstrated to reduce the rates of emergency caesarean section from 35 to 19%, and allowed better selection of vaginal breech birth. Live birth studies showed that the fetal head undergoes a substantial degree of moulding and deformation during cephalic vaginal birth, which is not considered during pelvimetry. There are conflicting studies on the role of MRI in cervical imaging and predicting time interval to birth.

conclusionMRI is a promising imaging modality to assess aspects of CPD, yet no current marker of CPD accurately predicts labour outcome. With advances in MRI, it is hoped that novel methods can be developed to better identify individuals at risk of obstructed or pathological labour. Its role in exploring fetal head moulding as a marker of CPD should be further explored.

Indexed as

Breech PresentationCephalopelvic DisproportionCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingPregnancyBirthCephalopelvic disproportionLabourMRI pelvimetry

Identifiers

PMID36536322
PMCPMC9761997
OpenAlexW4311881004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.