Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536290›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

An improved algorithm for flux variability analysis.

Dustin Kenefake, Erick Armingol, Nathan E Lewis, Efstratios N Pistikopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dustin KenefakeTexas A &M Energy Institute, Texas A &M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Erick ArmingolDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Nathan E LewisDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Efstratios N PistikopoulosTexas A &M Energy Institute, Texas A &M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA. stratos@tamu.edu.

Funding

Unraveling the mammalian secretory pathway through systems biology and algorithm developmentR35GM119850 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LEWIS, NATHAN ENOCH · 2016 to 2025
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flux balance analysis (FBA) is an optimization based approach to find the optimal steady state of a metabolic network, commonly of microorganisms such as yeast strains and Escherichia coli. However, the resulting solution from an FBA is typically not unique, as the optimization problem is, more often than not, degenerate. Flux variability analysis (FVA) is a method to determine the range of possible reaction fluxes that still satisfy, within some optimality factor, the original FBA problem. The resulting range of reaction fluxes can be utilized to determine metabolic reactions of high importance, amongst other analyses. In the literature, this has been done by solving [Formula: see text] linear programs (LPs), with n being the number of reactions in the metabolic network. However, FVA can be solved with less than [Formula: see text] LPs by utilizing the basic feasible solution property of bounded LPs to reduce the number of LPs that are needed to be solved. In this work, a new algorithm is proposed to solve FVA that requires less than [Formula: see text] LPs. The proposed algorithm is benchmarked on a problem set of 112 metabolic network models ranging from single cell organisms (iMM904, ect) to a human metabolic system (Recon3D). Showing a reduction in the number of LPs required to solve the FVA problem and thus the time to solve an FVA problem.

Indexed as

LipopolysaccharidesModels, BiologicalAlgorithmsEscherichia coliHumansMetabolic Flux AnalysisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysLipopolysaccharidesBiological systems engineeringFlux variability analysisLinear programming

Identifiers

PMID36536290
PMCPMC9761963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.