ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2023
Examining the influence of epithelium layer modeling approaches on vocal fold kinematics and kinetics.
Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-timescale finite element modeling of vocal fold edema progression due to phonotrauma.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- A proposal for epithelial dominance in extremely high fundamental frequency vocalizations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Synthetic, self-oscillating vocal fold models for voice production researcha).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Review
- The effect of swelling on vocal fold kinematics and dynamics.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grouping the thin epithelium and thicker superficial lamina propria layers into a single cover layer has been widely adopted in finite element vocal fold models. Recent silicone vocal fold studies have suggested, however, that inclusion of a distinct epithelial layer leads to more physiologically representative motion. This study systematically explores the ramifications of incorporating an epithelial layer into a cover grouping for finite element vocal fold modeling. A membrane model for the epithelium is introduced to facilitate parametric investigation by reducing the mesh density requirement of the epithelium into a single infinitesimally thin layer. Excluding the epithelium entirely leads to increased energy in higher order modes and larger inferior-superior excursion of the folds. Integrating the epithelium into a cover layer with volume-weighted average stiffness results in similar kinematics to that of a model treating the epithelium as a distinct layer. However, the internal stress/strain and contact pressure during collision are higher, and viscous dissipation is lower, when the epithelium is integrated into the cover. Thus, careful treatment of the epithelium is recommended for finite element studies, particularly when employing the models for estimating measures dependent upon internal stress/strain and/or collision pressure, such as vocal dose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.