Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36536188›Full record

ReviewMolecular biomedicine2022

An overview of PROTACs: a promising drug discovery paradigm.

Zi Liu, Mingxing Hu, Yu Yang, Chenghao Du, Haoxuan Zhou, Chengyali Liu, Yuanwei Chen, Lei Fan, Hongqun Ma, Youling Gong and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biomedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 169 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
169citing papers in PubMed
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

169 citing papers in PubMed, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PROTACs in cancer therapy: targeted degradation of GPX4, PARP and epigenetic regulators.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Evolving CRBN ligands enhance the drug-like properties of protein degraders.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. STAT3 signaling inhibitors for cancer treatment.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

109 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zi Liu *State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Mingxing Hu *State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yu Yang *State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chenghao DuDepartment of Biological Sciences, USC Dana and David Dornsife College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, Los Angeles, 90089, USA.
Haoxuan ZhouState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Chengyali LiuState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, China.
Yuanwei ChenHinova Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chengdu, 610041, China.
Lei FanHinova Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chengdu, 610041, China.
Hongqun MaHinova Pharmaceuticals Inc., Chengdu, 610041, China.
Youling GongDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. gongyouling@hotmail.com.
Yongmei XieState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, 610041, China. xieym@scu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7913-0283
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 22007070National Natural Science Foundation of China 22277086Sichuan Province Science and Technology Support Program 2022ZDZX0028the Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province 2022NSFSC1409West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2021HXBH006West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZYJC21075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) technology has emerged as a novel therapeutic paradigm in recent years. PROTACs are heterobifunctional molecules that degrade target proteins by hijacking the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Currently, about 20-25% of all protein targets are being studied, and most works focus on their enzymatic functions. Unlike small molecules, PROTACs inhibit the whole biological function of the target protein by binding to the target protein and inducing subsequent proteasomal degradation. PROTACs compensate for limitations that transcription factors, nuclear proteins, and other scaffolding proteins are difficult to handle with traditional small-molecule inhibitors. Currently, PROTACs have successfully degraded diverse proteins, such as BTK, BRD4, AR, ER, STAT3, IRAK4, tau, etc. And ARV-110 and ARV-471 exhibited excellent efficacy in clinical II trials. However, what targets are appropriate for PROTAC technology to achieve better benefits than small-molecule inhibitors are not fully understood. And how to rationally design an efficient PROTACs and optimize it to be orally effective poses big challenges for researchers. In this review, we summarize the features of PROTAC technology, analyze the detail of general principles for designing efficient PROTACs, and discuss the typical application of PROTACs targeting different protein categories. In addition, we also introduce the progress of relevant clinical trial results of representative PROTACs and assess the challenges and limitations that PROTACs may face. Collectively, our studies provide references for further application of PROTACs.

Indexed as

Design and synthesisPROTACProtein degradationUbiquitin–proteasome system

Identifiers

PMID36536188
PMCPMC9763089
OpenAlexW4312064763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.