SynthesisAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2023
Very Short Versus Longer Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Coronary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association 2025 Guidelines for Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention and Risk Assessment.Saudi medical journal · 2026Guideline
- Abbreviated dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Unlocking the Secrets of Acute Coronary Syndromes Using Intravascular Imaging: From Pathophysiology to Improving Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury: Unraveling Pathophysiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Emerging Prevention Strategies.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Thirty-Day Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Review
- Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Cancer; Balancing between Ischemic and Bleeding Risk: A Narrative Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023Review
- Thirty-Days versus Longer Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Treatment after Percutaneous Coronary Interventions with Newer Drug-Eluting Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Risk stratification algorithm for clinical outcomes in anemic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Annals of medicine · 2023Article
- Imaging of Left Main Coronary Artery; Untangling the Gordian Knot.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Comparing the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet with ticagrelor or clopidogrel in elderly Asian patients with acute myocardial infraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVery short (≤ 3 months) duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (VSDAPT) has recently been proposed after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stent (DES).
objectivesThe aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare very short versus > 3 months' duration of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) in patients undergoing PCI with DES, focusing on ischemic and bleeding events.
methodsThree major databases (Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) were screened for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary endpoint of our meta-analysis was the incidence of net adverse clinical events (NACE), as defined per trial, while secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, repeat revascularization, and major bleeding.
resultsWe included eight RCTs with a total of 41,204 patients; 20,592 patients were allocated to VSDAPT and the remaining 20,612 patients were randomized to a longer DAPT period. The abbreviated regimen significantly reduced NACE (odds ratio [OR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [Cl] 0.74-0.95) and major bleeding (OR 0.71, 95% Cl 0.61-0.82), without affecting mortality or ischemic events (stroke, myocardial infarction, revascularization, and stent thrombosis).
conclusionsVSDAPT significantly decreased the odds of NACEs and major bleeding by 17% and 29%, respectively, without increasing ischemic events. Thus, VSDAPT could be well tolerated and feasible after PCI with DES. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/4H2JB) Very short-term DAPT significantly reduces NACE and major bleedings, without affecting mortality and ischemic events (MACE, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis and revascularization). CI confidence intervals, DAPT dual antiplatelet therapy, DES drug-eluting stents, MACE major adverse cardiovascular events, MI myocardial infarction, NACE net adverse clinical events, OR odds ratio, PCI percutaneous coronary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.