ArticleScientific reports2022
Numerical and experimental study on the relationship between pull-out force and indentation depth of aviation wire crimp terminal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Geometry-Driven Deformation and Degradation Behavior of Crimped Electrical Connections Under Coupled Environmental and Chemical Loading.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To study the numerical relationship between the pull-out force and indentation depth of aviation wire crimp terminal, the crimping process between electrical contacts and stranded conductors and the tensile process of crimping assembly were simulated by the explicit dynamic finite element method. Regarding the variation trend of the tension of the crimping assembly with the tensile displacement during the tensile process and the failure mode, the numerical results and the experimental results showed a high degree of fit, and the relative error of the pull-out force was only 2.6%, which verified the reliability of the established numerical model. This model obtained the pull-out force curve of the crimp terminal that changes with the indentation depth. The authors suggest selecting the interval where the pull-out force is not less than 95% of the peak value, and the depth is less than the corresponding value at the peak value as the best value range of the indentation depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.